User talk:Watchcat1981

Hello, I'm Accurizer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Imus Ranch, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Accurizer (talk) 17:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC

ON THE CONTRARY ... ALL OF THE INFORMATION I HAVE PROVIDED THE IMUS PAGE IS 100% ACCURATE. THE SPECIAL ON THE RANCH IS AIRING LABOR DAY -- AS IF YOU DIDN' T KNOW! I don't have access to my computer right now but when I do, I will include endless article references and links to the lawsuit information, and if you persist to deny the accuracy of the posts and whitewash and sanitize the Imus page, I will approach much more powerful media outlets and make a mockery of Wiki, but mostly you. Dude, on a personal note, you're a total asshole to send me something that says disparaging comments are not welcome on Wiki. Does that mean the entry on Adolph Hitler calls him a nice guy? You're a dope. Also, there's no user talk page that I can find! Unless this is it. By the way, Imus' 45 year broadcasting career was made on disparraging others so don' t pull that crap on me. He was the original shock jock and he was fucking up my career and sending me to the hospital with his abuse before you were born, so on another personal note, fuck off!

August 2013
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Imus Ranch because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Accurizer (talk) 01:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Imus Ranch, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Accurizer (talk) 00:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Reply
Watchcat1981, I regret that you are obviously frustrated by your experience editing here. You should take the time to read the Verifiability policy. I hope that will explain why the edits you made were reverted. Even if you or I know that information is factual, it cannot be added to an article unless it comes from a published, reliable source. There is a guideline to help identify what is considered a reliable source: Identifying reliable sources. I would also encourage you to read the Five pillars to gain a better understanding of Wikipedia. I hope this is helpful. Accurizer (talk) 01:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Don't be ridiculous. I was on the road with an iPhone ....

That stuff on the Imus Ranch page had been there for months and months, and suddenly, a few days before the blow job Fox Business Network was about to give the Ranch, it was suddenly edited out. Of course the information was/is factual. If the ranch cost x million and it has only serviced y kids, then x divided by y equals the ridiculous amount per child to run. Basic math doesn't need any other sources. If someone was sued, and the court records are on line or not or printed or not, it still happened. No one needs to list a published source. And since when does the actual Imus show not qualify as a reliable source? I read Wiki film pages constantly and no one prints sources to list whether or not they saw someone appear in a motion picture. You're jerking my chain, but I don't care. You've been caught. There are plenty of other outlets to comment on the Imus Ranch. I don't have the time to start tracking down all the things I've read about Don and his mishugena Ranch through the years or analyze the nonsense I saw today on the show I mentioned three times. Guess what? It really aired! I'm pretty sure Fox Business Network really exists. I mentioned it, but you still took it down. If you were legitimate you would have highlighted the original material, then contacted me, and questioned me about it. But you're not, so you just took it down and sanitized the page before the show. In a few years, you can take down the page altogether, because when Don kicks, the Ranch will kick, too. In the meantime, you can enjoy the commentary on this page -- https://www.facebook.com/pages/Don-Imus/324773788241

No one can edit it. Knock yourself out! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.244.97.105 (talk) 03:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)