User talk:Watcher

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!


 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.


 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.


 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 12:09, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Stephen King Books
Hi Watcher. I have made your deletion requests for your old Stephen King pages into redirects, instead of deleting them. This way, if somebody types Word Processor of the Gods, they land in the right place. Thanks for your contributions. -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:33, 10 May 2004 (UTC)

Mozilla
I don't follow you when you say "you say you did all the IT build support"; can you tell me where you saw that? I've not done much with Mozilla except run it and peruse the web site.

Anyway, I don't think I've tinkered with complex builds either. Most of the programming that I work on is my own stuff (mostly trivial stuff) or for work.

Sorry!

Scott McNay 04:57, 2004 May 20 (UTC)

Dante
Well, it's certainly not a direct quote, as I learned by doing a bit of digging. President Kennedy seems to have attributed the line to Dante, and it was likely taken from a passage in Inferno, perhaps liberally translated. http://www.bartleby.com/73/1211.html is a reference. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 07:26, May 24, 2004 (UTC)

Efficient Learning Method
Hi, in some cases, like how to teach dynamic programming, or how to explain the earth revolving at its axes, and how it revolves the sun, at the same time the moon revolves the earth and the sun. It is not quite easy to explain these things merely using books, it needs lot of dynamic/changing graphics or photos or computer graphics to describe what we meant. Also in some cases it could meant how efficient or how fast could we teach a person to do some specific task as planned, like Building a home, etc with less overhead. I don't think I'm competence enough to continue writing in this topic. But hey, this is wikipedia, let's hope someone could develop this article. Roscoe x 09:22, 28 May 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Learning styles
Learning styles has been nominated for Collaboration of the Week. You might be interested. --Westendgirl 04:14, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

MEChA
I noticed your edits to MEChA. Are you the same Watcher who posts on the SOS forum?--Rockero 18:55, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

FYI: Dawg
Hey I see that you've changed the above from a redirect to a disambiguation page. You should know that the redirect was the result of a debate (Articles for deletion/Dawg). I don't think you're recreating deleted content exactly since you've added something new. I've been thinking that this needed to be a redirect as well, but for other reasons (with a link to David Grisman, aka Dawg). I suppose it is OK for us to go ahead with this. What do you think? -MrFizyx 02:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination for EditPad
An article that you have been involved in editing, EditPad, has been listed by Vacuum Cleaner 01 (a self-admitted sockpuppet) for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/EditPad. Thank you. --Urod 04:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC), fixed --Urod 04:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Embassy of God
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Embassy of God, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Embassy of God seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Embassy of God, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Embassy of God itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Freelancing on the Internet
An editor has nominated Freelancing on the Internet, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mpatrol


The article Mpatrol has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable software marked for notability since September 2008. No references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Kwanzaa
Category:Kwanzaa, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Mental retardation
Category:Mental retardation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 15:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Internet manipulation and propaganda
Category:Internet manipulation and propaganda, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 15:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Typing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Typing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Typing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of CoOffice for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CoOffice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CoOffice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  13:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Dihydrogen monoxide hoax for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dihydrogen monoxide hoax is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dihydrogen monoxide hoax until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K7L (talk) 03:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Chapek listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chapek. Since you had some involvement with the Chapek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 03:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Capek listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Capek. Since you had some involvement with the Capek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)