User talk:WatercolorFigs

Welcome!
Hello, WatercolorFigs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  23:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April Events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Copyright
On the talk page of Katherine Elizabeth McClellan you claimed the copied site had a cc licence and was acceptable for Wikipedia. I accept that you copied the material in good faith, and if you can guide me to where it makes it clear that the specific text you copied is either out of copyright under US law, explicitly public domain or available under an explicit CC BY-SA 3.0 Licence, I'll restore the page. Otherwise you will need to rewrite in your own words. Incidentally, it looks as if much of her work, including her photos, was done before 1924 and is out of US copyright, so that can be used freely here. The problem is that the modern bio isn't offered for unrestricted free use. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Firstly, not all cc licences are compatible with Wikipedia, since many exclude commercial use. We need explicit public domain or CC BY-SA 3.0 licensing
 * You claimed that the site had a suitable CC, but I can't see where it says that
 * , as a Smith librarian, perhaps you can clariy too? Cheers, Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Any updates, ? :) User:Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi folks. Our collection guides are indeed CC-BY licensed, and you're right that this isn't posted. We have a ticket in to our hosting service to put the CC badge at the bottom of our site. Thanks for catching this! Shockofsputnik (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, when it's done, let know and she'll restore. When it's restored, instead of using  multiple times, do the first one as >  and just    subsequently, which will give a much neater outcome, a bit like ref 1 of Pamela C. Rasmussen Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  14:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks like we're still waiting on the ticket, ! Just checking in. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The badge on our website has been updated to say CC-BY!, and . Shockofsputnik (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! I'll restore the page, . Megalibrarygirl (talk) 14:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)