User talk:Watercolor Rose

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hematology analyzer has been accepted
 Hematology analyzer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Gpkp ( u • t • c ) 13:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hematology_analyzer help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Watercolor Rose. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place help me on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 04:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm EchidnaLives. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to David Daleiden—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  01:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello echidnaLives,
 * Thank you for your work on Wikipedia. However, the group references is "pro-life" rather than "anti-choice" as the article on the movement mentions.
 * This edit reflects that fact only.
 * Thank you,
 * Watercolor Rose (talk) 01:57, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in United States anti-abortion movement. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 01:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello LilianaUwU,
 * Respectfully, the consensus on the group reference is "pro-life" rather than "anti-choice," as the article itself mentions. My alterations reflect this correction, and this correction alone.
 * Thank you,
 * Watercolor Rose (talk) 01:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at United States anti-abortion movement, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.  luis .  💬 01:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello luis,
 * Thank you for your help monitoring Wikipedia pages. However, my edit reflected the correct reference to the group ("pro-life" rather than "anti-choice").
 * Best,
 * Watercolor Rose (talk) 01:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at David Daleiden. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 02:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello LilianaUwU,
 * Can you please explain how my edits were disruptive? The activists involved in the movement refer to the movement as the "pro-life" movement. Some opposed to the movement refer to it as "anti-choice." Therefore, referring to the movement as "anti-choice" favors its opposition while "pro-life" is neutral.
 * Thank you,
 * Watercolor Rose (talk) 02:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If it's the activists in the movement that refer to the movement as "pro-life", then we have a great reason to not follow that. Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 02:08, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry for that outburst, it's just that it's a thing I care about. Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 02:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey no worries! :) honestly i'd love to hear your perspective about it sometime if you have the time!
 * Best,
 * Watercolor Rose (talk) 02:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Not all anti-abortionists are pro-life, many defend the death penalty.
 * Thus although people can call themselves anything they want to, our articles don't have to reflect that. Doug Weller  talk 15:34, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * FYI, Requests for comment/Abortion article titles there's a consensus for "anti-abortion" and "pro-abortion". Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 02:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 02:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)