User talk:Waterman0201

August 2013
Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Aryan for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 09:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Please be aware that you should not revert to your preferred version repeatedly. This is called "edit warring". Per WP:3RR, can be be blocked from editing if you repeatedly revert. Three reverts per day is the maximum allowable for anything other than vandalism. You have already been told that the talk pages are not a forum for discussion or for presenting personal theories. They are for discussing the content of the article. Paul B (talk) 12:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Administrators know whats happening here,,people like you are the opposite of what men like Julian Assange stand for--Waterman0201 (talk) 12:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * See Free speech. Paul B (talk) 13:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing.  Neil N   talk to me  13:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Ṛta
The references you are adding to the article are completely irrelevant. The first one is about a Buddhist/Hindu goddess Tara and makes no note of either Ṛta or Ireland; the rest are just lists of place names in Ireland named Tara. You would need an etymology source actually saying that the three are cognates.

And "it is interesting" is a phrase that is expressly discouraged by the manual of style as a weasel term. (Who found it interesting? Presumedly, it's just you.) And article content is never signed (the attribution of your edit is preserved in the article history). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Ill take note in future,thank you--Waterman0201 (talk) 07:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Neil N   talk to me  14:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your addition to O'Connell (name) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''Stop it. Sentences are exact copies from the website.  Neil N   talk to me '' 15:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chakra, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Enough with the unsourced original research. This is your last warning.  Neil N   talk to me '' 15:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Your addition was completely unsourced; Wikipedia can't recursively use itself as a reference. (It wasn't written in an encyclopedic style, either.) And for the second time, article contents are never signed. You need to sign your comments on a talk page, but NOT your additions to an article. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
I am afraid I have blocked you (as well as User:Cloudassault) from editing until further notice, for persistent addition of unsourced material and original research to articles, revert warring, and sockpuppetry. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:10, 19 August 2013 (UTC)