User talk:Wattlebird

Image tagging for Image:Leo (70s show).png
Thanks for uploading Image:Leo (70s show).png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Vlcsnap-9782385.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Vlcsnap-9782385.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 17:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vlcsnap-9782385.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vlcsnap-9782385.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 17:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. P4k 00:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. P4k 02:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --CyberGhostface 16:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Inappropriate edit summaries
Edit summaries like the one seen here are very inappropriate. If you continue to use them, especially in an effort to get speculative information that is unsourced into an entry, you could and probably should find yourself blocked. AniMate 22:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:New laurie.png
Thanks for uploading Image:New laurie.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leo (70s show).png
Thanks for uploading Image:Leo (70s show).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vlcsnap-9782385.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Vlcsnap-9782385.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

March 2008
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming articles is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Steve Irwin
An excellent choice for the header picture on the Steve Irwin article, but I felt it was just too flat and two-dimensional to properly represent such a three dimensional charecter as Steve. dimo414 (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kath kim logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:Kath kim logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kath kim logo.gif)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Kath kim logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Futurama article
Please see Talk:Futurama, because I still think you are wrong. --Svippong 23:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. AniMate  draw  08:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Michael Jackson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Impala2009 | Talk 01:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Michael Jackson. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Impala2009 | Talk 01:40, 11 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Regarding that undo, please do not revert reversions that were trying to discompose vandalism. Thank you. Impala2009 | Talk 01:51, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Grow up please
The edit you made to Michael Jackson was very inappropriate. Please have some respect. GreekStar12 (talk) 03:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Saw VI
We started a thread on Talk:Saw VI about your edits. Basically, the Saw VI page is the wrong place to put sequel information. If it was just one movie and wasn't part of a series, then yes, it would go there. But it's best suited for the Saw (franchise) article. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:26, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Scrubs (TV series). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Chevy  Impala   2009  00:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Scrubs (TV series). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Chevy  Impala   2009  00:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Scrubs
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. BOVINEBOY 2008 00:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked for edit-warring (and violation of the three-revert rule on Scrubs (TV series). To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text  along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator.  For alternative methods to appeal, see Appealing a block. --  tariq abjotu  04:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

copyright violation
Please do not copy and paste stuff from other websites. Doing so is a Copyright violation. You will be blocked if you continue to do so. Be sure to summarize what you reference.  C T J F 8 3 Talk 06:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate copyright, you will be blocked from editing.  C T J F 8 3 Talk 21:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Warning
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing.  C T J F 8 3 Talk 07:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Family Guy total episode number
I saw the same thing on you on twitter that said 19, however thats not a concrete number, as there were 22 production season 6 episodes and they obviously all didn't air in one season. Anyways she didn't include something, something, something darkside in her count anyways so it should be 20-21 episodes this season depending if you count the hour long star wars episode as one or two episodes. So that 19 that was given on twitter is nothing concrete as its basically up to FOX and how they decide to schedule the show that will ultimately determine how many episodes air this season, since if a lot comes up this year maybe only 16 of those 19 will air etc...Grande13 (talk) 11:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. AussieLegend (talk) 11:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Scrubs episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 04:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Cleveland Show in New Zealand
My understanding was always, the standard for episode placement on a list is based on the actual date on which it debuts, which would put it where I put it. I'd be ready for some resistance on that one if I were you (just not from me...life's too short). KnownAlias  contact  01:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * But you also changed the episode number from 15 to 20. Which is completely incorrect... Wattlebird (talk) 01:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, that's where the debate kicks in. "Once Upon a Tyne in New York" was the 15th episode in the US.  So you're saying New Zealand's #15 takes precedence over America's?  KnownAlias   contact  02:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No - it was intended to air as 15 but FOX decided not to air it. Look at List of Eastwick episodes, ABC skipped episode 11 and aired episode 12 as 11. However the wikipedia article lists the episodes in their INTENDED order - which is what im trying to do here. Wattlebird (talk) 02:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair arguement, but one logic that could have been behind that was that it was a serialized show that was specifically intended to run in that specific order, whereas Cleveland, as well as all of the Fox cartoons, can be aired in whatever order the network chooses, as there is no chronological plot. Whatever, man.  I'm just saying you might catch flak on this one.  But it ain't my fight.  Happy editing.  KnownAlias   contact  02:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Ship'rect
"Almost" is the key word... C T J F 8 3 chat 10:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Bigbangthoery originatitlecard.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bigbangthoery originatitlecard.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 13:56, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Bigbangthoery originatitlecard.jpg, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 05:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:45, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. If this continues, you may be blocked from further editing. CloudKade11 (talk) 03:16, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but you seem to continue adding information without any reliable sources. Adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is your second warning, and your opinion on the site doesn't matter here. I'm sorry to say the site you keep adding is not reliable. Sites like Zap2it, Hollywood Reporter, Bloody disgusting, Variety, Hollwood insider and comingsoon are all examples of whats actually reliable. If you continue to apply these disruptive edits, you will be reported and blocked from any editing on Wikipedia. Thanks. CloudKade11 (talk) 00:22, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? I don't speak with users that decide to be immature and rude in a simple conversation. Thus, I cannot take you seriously, and therefore will not listen to any of your needs. And it depends what kind of articles are using TFC. I for one have never heard of that site. Neither 6 other users on here that I have noted on this issue. No more warnings. I will change the articles back to normal, and if I find out you have undone my edits, you WILL be reported and BLOCKED from editing on Wikipedia. Please, all I ask is for you to stop your disruptive editing. Thanks. CloudKade11 (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * FYI, I was using that as an example. It wasn't my exact reason for the change. I thought you were smart enough to realize that already. CloudKade11 (talk) 05:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * So now you decide to get a reliable source? I have to review the source first of all. So I'm not done here. Half a brain? Please, don't even get started with me or you'll just end up looking like an idiot. Thanks. CloudKade11 (talk) 05:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Who am I? Really? It's at a point where it's OBVIOUSLY not reliable. So therefore I have to judge. What are you even doing on Wikipedia? Judging by your previous conversations with other users I could tell your a bit of a trouble maker around here. Or just some spineless idiot that doesn't know when it's time to stop goofing off and start following the rules. CloudKade11 (talk) 05:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Four nz logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Four nz logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Four nz logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Four nz logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bunnyhouse-titlecard.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Bunnyhouse-titlecard.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

this seems a little silly to be arguing about but
re List_of_Holly's_World_episodes (specifically, edit reverting the title of A Hard Night's Day back) why did you revert my edit with no argument or evidence provided for doing so - admittedly, my evidence wasn't very good, but it was evidence, and I had actually seen at least part of the episode and was fairly sure I knew what the title was from what I'd seen? :) thanks and happy editing, and apologies for my tone truly... just confused. (Come to think of, not sure where to find authoritative evidence, fwiw. I should really stick to music and stay confused there- and historical matters there are confusing enough :D )Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Season split
Please stop splitting these, they are premature, you're cannibalizing the other articles just so you can have something on the new article. Season pages should be created for only two reasons, 1) the main article gets to big, 2) the episode list gets to big. Neither of those two is the case at this point. There is no "it's renewed for a second season so we need to create a season article".  X  eworlebi (talk) 13:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * What's the point in removing the article now if it's just going to be re-created in a few months time? Besides, with your reverts you are removing information that isn't on the other pages. And its not "cannibalizing the other articles", it's moving information to a place where it is better suited. Wattlebird (talk) 13:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * They won't be (or shouldn't be) recreated in a few months. There's no need for them. The episode list tends to get too long around four seasons, depending on the level of episode summaries, so that would take 4 more years. The main article is currently fairly poor, removing valid information from it just so you can validate the new article is cannibalizing it. And it's not to long, by a long shot. This split is premature and it lowers the quality of the current articles.  X  eworlebi (talk) 13:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The reverts you are doing on the main article is only adding four lines of text to it. So why are you reverting that then? Does four lines REALLY make a difference? Wattlebird (talk) 13:18, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Not particularly relevant, but besides introducing some errors, a unneeded table, removing 5 paragraphs, several hundreds of words, yes removing correct and valid information makes a difference to the quality of the article.  X  eworlebi (talk) 13:25, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  X  eworlebi (talk) 13:25, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Orphaned non-free image File:Hollysworld-originaltitlecard.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Hollysworld-originaltitlecard.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 06:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ship'rect - The Cleveland Show promo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ship'rect - The Cleveland Show promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. When you recently edited Happy Endings: Happy Rides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Scrubs production codes
Hey, just wanted to stop by and say good job on the correcting of the production codes for season 8 of Scrubs. That's a fantastic source and you can't get anymore official than that. I went and checked out the other seasons, and made a few fixes per the source. That's a really helpful resource for these types of things, especially for shows which don't feature production codes in the end credits, because it's pretty hard finding them otherwise. Anyway, just wanted to say thanks and good job! Drovethrughosts (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

File:The Big Bang Theory origina titlecard.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Big Bang Theory origina titlecard.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  00:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheblockNZ logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:TheblockNZ logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Snooki & JWoww
Hi. Please do not add sourced speculation to articles, as you did with this edit to Snooki & JWoww. Doing so violates the site's WP:Verifiability, No Original Research and Source Citation policies. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New laurie.png
 Thanks for uploading File:New laurie.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Happyendings s2dvd.png
Thanks for uploading File:Happyendings s2dvd.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Personal attack
Your recent edit summary comments on List of Don't Trust the B in Apartment 23 episodes are a gross violation the Wikipedia statue No personal attacks. Your edit was in error and has been reverted. Also, I recommend reading Edit warring. LiamNolan24 (talk) 03:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

3RR violation on The New Normal
Your recent editing history at The New Normal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Drmargi (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

666 Park Avenue
Your recent editing history at 666 Park Avenue shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MisterShiney   ✉    23:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Your recent editing history at 666 Park Avenue shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 02:20, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

See note
at Talk:666 Park Avenue. Steven Walling &bull; talk   04:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at 666 Park Avenue. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

MyLeftNut
I am going to ask you a point-blank question; your candor will be greatly appreciated: are you currently posting as the new user, MyLeftNut? If so, 'fessing up now will be enormously in your best interest. if a sock-puppetry investigation is allowed to conclude, you won't be able to edit Wikipedia anymore. If you speak up now, you will likely be blocked for a longer period - we have very explicit rules about what you are doing, after all - but you'd be able to return after that. The ball is in your court. Swing carefully. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 22:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yip. - Wattlebird (talk) 06:58, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the honesty, Wattlebird. Please don't do that again. Did you also edit unde the IP 222.153.223.36? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You don't want me to be honest again? :P Also, yes. - Wattlebird (talk) 07:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:KUWtK titlecard.png)
Thanks for uploading File:KUWtK titlecard.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Laurie Forman.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Laurie Forman.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:New laurie.png)
Thanks for uploading File:New laurie.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kourtneykhloetakemiami titlecard.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Kourtneykhloetakemiami titlecard.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Happy Endings (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:39, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Happy Endings (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 14:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

File:The Block All-Stars Logo.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Block All-Stars Logo.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

File:The Block Sky High logo.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Block Sky High logo.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Block All-Stars Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Block All-Stars Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Block Sky High logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Block Sky High logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Middle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Season 11 & 12 dispute
I have started up a discussion on the American Dad! talk page here Season 11 & 12 dispute, so we can get the feedback of other users as to this matter. I have explained my reasoning for why I don't agree with labeling the three episodes on Fox to air on 2 dates as it's own separate season. You are free to provide your input in this discussion.

Also, you failed to sign your posts at my user talk page. Please remember to sign your post by writing the following in parenthesis "````". Cheers! AmericanDad86 (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Policy-breaking at American Dad! article
WattleBird I have reported you here Administrators' noticeboard/Archive263 for breaking policy at the American Dad article and instating your edit before consensus is reached. Wikipedia states that articles must remain in the version they were in before the edit under debate until consensus is reached. As you're flouting this policy and being unreasoned on the article talk page, I have reported you and requested page protection. AmericanDad86 (talk) 22:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution Noticeboard
As your behavior has become increasingly disruptive at the American Dad! article and talk page regarding a recent edit, I have turned the matter over to the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. As community consensus doesn't seem to register with you and you just blatantly dismiss the individuals disagreeing with you, I've relayed the issues to this board, as provided here Dispute resolution noticeboard. You are encouraged to provide your input at that article. Thank you AmericanDad86 (talk) 23:44, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Block Fans vs Faves logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:The Block Fans vs Faves logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Block Fans vs Faves logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:The Block Fans vs Faves logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Vote on to KEEP or CHANGE American Dad's episode guide.
Hey there, us over at the American Dad! talk page are considering are deciding if we should KEEP the longer-season number (in which Season 11 would be the "three episodes" and TBS's season would be Season 12) or CHANGING to the fewer-season method (in which Season 10 is the three episodes and Season 11 is the TBS season). On September 12, 2014, we will be changing or keeping the episode guide and are asking you to vote on to KEEP or CHANGE the episode guide. Thanks. Spongey253 (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of American Dad! episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Barker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Please don't edit-war at Anger Management (TV series). Your edit has been reverted so please discuss at the article's talk page and note that the status quo reigns while discussion is underway. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 22:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Natalia Kills, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This for redirecting the Natalia Kills article to cunt. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 03:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Mindy Project Season 4 Episodes
Besides the issue of episode order for episodes 15 and 16, I added the final episodes of the series with some basic information that has already been released, which you completely removed with total disregard to how much effort I put in. That was brash and completely uncalled for. I used multiple sources and references to back up my findings, which are now all completely lost. Also, I did read the talk page before making my edits. There was no need for your comment when you reverted the edits (again!). Please make sure you know what you're editing before you revert all work done on the page.

--Soccerfray (talk) 02:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheblockNZ logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:TheblockNZ logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

December 2016


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 01:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You're an experienced editor. What are you playing at with this? –&#8239;Joe (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Seems someone else with access to my PC decided to be "funny". - Wattlebird (talk) 05:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm FlyingAce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Māori people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –FlyingAce✈talk 23:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 10:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

File:GND6 rough.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GND6 rough.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Disjointed card.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Disjointed card.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Michael Muhney, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 22:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Simpsons 19x01 movie callback.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Simpsons 19x01 movie callback.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tooken (disambiguation)


The article Tooken (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A disambiguation page is not required. The primary topic article has a hatnote to the other possible use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Girlsnextdoor-titlecard.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Girlsnextdoor-titlecard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 18:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)