User talk:Watz2ya

The article Jacki mccallum has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:56, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacki mccallum


A tag has been placed on Jacki mccallum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Drmies (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Please consider rewriting that article so it becomes properly structured with a introductory section and a discussion of the court proceedings. And you should also provide a complete weblink to your reference not just such brief IDs as you mentioned in the current article. That said, references belong to the bottom of an article and should get a section heading ==References== . The current unstructured article appears to contain lots of your personal points of view and may well be nominated for deletion again if it doesn't get improved. And who is Jacki McCallum after all? That will either be pointed out in the very first sentence or the page name must be changed to something like McCallum vs. Company X. De728631 (talk) 02:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)