User talk:Waveguy

Breadboard_scheme.svg
Would you kindly check Breadboard article discussion? I already left a comment regarding file which needs correction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.98.204.179 (talk) 12:57, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

CSB articles
What of interest belongs in Category:CSB_Articles? and Why?

Article Licensing
User:Ram-Man writes:


 * Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer.  The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles.  Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles.  Over 90% of people asked have agreed.  For More Information:


 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project


 * To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace.  The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:


 * Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ".  If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too.  Please let me know what you think at my talk page.  It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking.  -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Unverified images
Hi. You uploaded Image:Coaxial-cable.gif but did not list any source and/or copyright information on the image description page. Please mark it either as GFDL or public domain. See Image_copyright_tags for more info. Please note that images without copyright information may be deleted in the future. Thanks. RedWolf 21:41, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
 * Ok, slowly catching up with Policy as it shifts here. All images I've uploaded I drew myself. I'll add license tags Waveguy 19:35, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * RLC circuit
 * tuned circuit
 * coaxial cable
 * tuned circuit 1 MHz 20 dB gain
 * simple RF probe circuit
 * diagram of breadboard signal traces
 * diagram of waveform: amplitude modulation
 * waveguide propagation mode transverse electic 1,1
 * waveguide propagation mode transverse electric 1,0
 * hypothetical design for a fractal antenna

Meetup/Toronto
Hi. Are you interested in Toronto Wikipedia Meetups? If so, please add Meetup/Toronto to your watchlist and help us choose a place and time on the talk page. Regards, --unforgettableid | talk to me 19:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 04:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Lets get together!
I think we should all sit down and drink and eat and what not. I propose a meetup at Future Bakery, on the corner of Brunswick and Bloor, on Wed. August 16, 2006 @ 7pm. Lets discuss it. josh buddy, talk 15:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Amplitude-modulation.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Amplitude-modulation.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 21:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Fractal16.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fractal16.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

test some math
$$1 + \int_{a}^{x} \frac {f(t)} {t^{3}} dt = 3 x^{-3}, \quad \, x>0$$ -- Waveguy (talk) 03:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)