User talk:WavesSaid

Welcome


Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.


 * Main Introduction — What is Wikipedia?
 * The Five Pillars — What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
 * Quick Introductions to:
 * Policies and guidelines — How does Wikipedia actually work?
 * Talk pages — How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
 * Referencing — How do I add sources to articles?
 * Uploading images — How do I add and use images?
 * Navigating Wikipedia — How do I find my way around?


 * What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?

 * If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
 * If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
 * If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
 * For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

November 2012
Your recent editing history at Bozhidar Dimitrov shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

ARBMAC
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Bozhidar Dimitrov
Hello WavesSaid. I notice you still have a complaint open about this article at BLP/N. In my opinion it is unlikely that your complaint will get any traction there. The claim of WP:COATRACK doesn't appear justified. A coatrack is usually a case where unrelated material is being dragged in to contest some other issue. As it says in that page, "A coatrack article fails to give a truthful impression of the subject." The ten points listed in our Bozhidar Dimitrov article are the actual views of Dimitrov so they aren't unrelated. To help create an article which has better balance, I'd suggest that you add to the article some mentions of the reviews that the book has received. From the discussion at Talk:Bozhidar Dimitrov it seems that such reviews exist. Since I assume you know the local language you should be able to locate these. Few Wikipedia editors have enough background to comment in this area, so if you can actually improve the completeness of this article it would be appreciated. In case you imagine that the article inspires unwarranted sympathy for Dimitrov's views, don't worry about that. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution
Hi! I am a dispute resolution volunteer at WP:DRN. It appears that your case is one of those where the other parties choose to not participate, so I am going to close it as failed. Alas, we can't make them participate at DRN, because DRN was purposely designed to not be able to force anyone to do anything. his is not true of some of the other steps in dispute resolution.

Do you need assistance or advice about how to proceed, or is WP:DR clear enough? Note that I am not expressing any opinion as to who is right or wrong; I am just offering help navigating through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I noticed that you have filed a new case at WP:DRN which was closed because it did not meet our requirements. Please read the following carefully before filing any further disputes. Thanks!

{| style="border: 0; width: 100%;"
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:


 * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:


 * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
 * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
 * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
 * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:


 * Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors.   Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
 * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
 * Sign and date your posts with four tildes " ".
 * If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

--Guy Macon (talk) 02:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)