User talk:Wawaxi

Welcome

 * }

July 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

See, bbb23, this shows how you are either immature or lack professionalism that you would block for self interests. I should not bother to appeal the block because if someone entrusted with such high level powers as you engages is so much misconduct, Wikipedia attracts the wrong crowd as admins.

A word of personal advice. Do not act this way in life because you may get bitten and have to face up to personal responsibility for an attitude like yours.

I said something because I am very certain that I am in a different country than whiskeymouth so chexck users could verify that.

As a matter of a test, I will ask unblock but would be shocked if fairness prevailed and it was done.

Wawaxi (talk) 13:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Reason: my edit history within the past 8 hours is short and easy to see. Wawaxi (talk) 13:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I am contacting the blocking admin to get a better understanding of this block. HighInBC Need help?   14:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * proof that you deny an unblock request before looking into it.


 * every time I look into Wikipedia, I see a lack of professionlism and just shake my head. I commented, in part, because I was certain that I am in a different country than the involved users based on syntax clues.


 * your denial is not surprising but unfortunate. My block is solely for exercising freedom of speech as WP is USA based. Wawaxi (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Well that is a great example of what I was talking about. I did look at your edits, and I talked to the blocking admin. You just assumed bad faith on my part and accused me of denying your request without looking. I have explained to you what the issues are. HighInBC Need help?   16:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Also take a look at Free speech. Free speech means you can say whatever you like on your own website, it does not mean you can say whatever you like on someone else's website. If you are going to demand your US rights you should learn their limits. HighInBC Need help?   16:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * as you asked. I saw the issue in the category unblock page.


 * as you asked, I do not plan to write about this whiskeyman issue but was more concerned about lack of professionalism and transparency.


 * i do not claim a legal violation of free speech but say it violates the principle.


 * I am disappointed that your harsh and unfair response is not becoming of a good admin. Sorry. I suspect a lot of vandalism is a result of less than optimal admin handling of matters. I cannot vouch for whiskeyman but that type of handling is liable to start long term wikipedia vandalism. Winklelvi may be combative because of prior unfair blocks so he has evolved into a disruptive user that knows how to avoid indefinite blocks. Wawaxi (talk) 16:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Wawaxi, as you are continuing with your personal attacks on other Wikipedia editors here, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page for the duration of your block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)