User talk:Waya sahoni/Archive 4

WP:NPA
Please refrain from making WP:PA, as you did here. I am asking all participants to do the same. Let's keep this focused on the issues, not on anyone's background, shall we? --MJ( &#x260E; 11:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Practice what you preach. You have personally attacked me over 40 times, and you are not stopping. Waya sahoni 17:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Please show me links to diffs where you feel I have attacked you since I apologized. You certainly don't seem to practise this. --MJ( &#x260E; 21:22, 5 March 2006


 * MJ, Have a great day. Waya sahoni 21:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I have been going out of my way to make sure I adhere to WP:NPA, but if you can recount at least 40 times where I apparently violated that policy, I'd like to know about that. I'd appreciate if you could show me some links to specific edits of mine where you feel that I violated the guideline, together with your explanation why you felt attacked. I don't need all 40+ such occurences, but with so many transgressions you surely can show me a handful? --MJ( &#x260E; 16:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Johnny Depp's Cherokee blood
I apologise for the detail about unverified blood quantum. I just read that he was 1/4 Native American and read both parents are part-Cherokee, so i only assumed. --Icecycle 01:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

It's ok. Unless they have a Certificate Degree of Indian Blood issued by the Bureau of Indians Affairs, it's not verifiable. Under our law and BIA regulations, giving our blood quantum or copies of CBID or tribal cards except to Federal authorities or law enforcement is a serious offense. Because of this, most indians do not provide copies of these documents, so even knowing this information does not make it verifiable. Tribal Roll numbers are like social security numbers, and they can and have been misused in the past (to get eagle feathers or buy peyote in Texas with fraudulent documents). So you should always question anytime someone tells you blood quantums. It's also considered very impolite and disrespectful by most indians to post such information without consent. If an indian gives and interview, are a member of an indian tribe, and gives out the info, then you could use it, but not verify it, so in either case, it probably does not belong on WP. Waya sahoni 01:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries
Please just make a note archiving or something like that in the edit summary, without it we take it as blanking and revert. Thanks -- Tawker 05:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No worries, it happens, I just like to point it so people don't get confused about why I reverted :) -- Tawker 05:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * You have got to be the fastest revert editor I have ever seen. Wow!  Waya sahoni 05:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

archiving at JVM
Yah, it was archived. I missed that in my haste. But there was an ongoing discussion. It would have been nice of you to bring that forward, otherwise it looks as tho you were trying to hide something. --Vryl 08:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a message board or a blog. You should take these activities back to SCOX where you came from.  Replicating talk page content wastes space.  Waya sahoni 09:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Why does my Watchlist say "You have new messages". Why do users have a Talk Page? --Vryl 05:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Do not make personal attacks like that. Keep WP:NPA in mind. Further Mr. Merkey, you're the one who needs to be reminded that wikipedia isn't a blog. You're the one editing your own article, which is against wikipedia policy. --BWD(talk) 13:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Making allegations of identity and attempting to expose a users identity (and inaccurately I might add) is an extremely serious breach of WP:NPA. I can edit any article I feel I have relevant content for.  Please don't visit my talk page in the future if you are going to post this type of content.  Waya sahoni 04:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Exposing sock puppets is a violation of nothing. --BWD(talk) 04:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Stalking and harassment on the other hand are something, so please stop. Waya sahoni 04:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Nobody is being stalked Mr. Merkey, . However, this is cyberstalking. Have a nice day Mr. Merkey . --BWD(talk) 04:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, that appears to be a listing of cyber-stalkers. I guess you are right. Its a very long list of cyberstalkers.  Perhaps it should be included in that article.  Waya sahoni 04:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Now, Mr Waya Jeff Sahoni Merkey, calling people "cyberstalkers" is certainly a personal attack, don't you agree? I thought you were against personal attacks? --Vryl 04:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I think you must be referring to BWD's post above which makes such allegations, unless you are referring to his behavior. Waya sahoni 04:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * No Jeff, you know *exactly* to what it was that I was referring. Why play these silly games, YOU NEVER WIN.  You never convince anyone, and just make yourself look sillier and sillier.  To what end?  --Vryl 04:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I am not currently editing any articles with you or discussing content with you, so why are you posting comments on this page? Are you also stalking me along with BWD?.  Unless you intend to post discssions about content, please stay off this talk page.  It's for editors to discuss article edits and content, and not for general use by message board trolls.  Waya sahoni 05:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Waya sahoni. I've come to the conclusion that certain folks have nasal issues.  Be of good cheer and know that some feel you are being wrongly accused.  --Bookofsecrets 12:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)