User talk:Wayland


 * 2003 archive
 * 2004 archive
 * 2005 archive
 * 2006 archive
 * 2007 archive
 * 2008 archive

Message regarding your use of the No Multi License Template
In case you are not aware, the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed that the copyright licensing terms on the wikis operated by the WMF – including Wikipedia – be changed to include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license in addition to the current GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) as allowed by version 1.3 of the GFDL. The community has approved this change with 75.8% in favor, and on June 15, 2009, the change will take effect. You currently have NoMultiLicense on your user or user talk page, which states that your edits are licensed under the GFDL only. On or before June 15, this template will be changed to reflect Wikipedia's new licensing terms. If you accept the licensing change, you do not need to do anything (and feel free to remove this message); if you do not accept it, we regret that you will no longer be able to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please join the discussion at Village pump (policy) if you have any comments.

Delivered by The  Helpful  Bot  at 20:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC) for the Village pump. Report errors here.

Articles for deletion nomination of 23 Enigma
I have nominated 23 Enigma, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/23 Enigma. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simonm223 (talk) 02:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC) (The '23 Enigma' message above was sent to me in error. I wasn't the author of that article). --wayland (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Freak scene


The article Freak scene has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced speculative Original Research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  SilkTork  *YES! 11:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:IT 1971-09-09 B-IT-Volume-1 Iss-112 020-clip.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:IT 1971-09-09 B-IT-Volume-1 Iss-112 020-clip.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:IT 1971-09-09 B-IT-Volume-1 Iss-112 020-clip.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IT 1971-09-09 B-IT-Volume-1 Iss-112 020-clip.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 11:21, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

--wayland (talk) 23:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Email forwarded to  as requested.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Towns in Nevada
Category:Towns in Nevada, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home 02:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * There is no proof that they exist by law. All incorporated cites in Nevada are Cities. the CDP's have town boards, but they are not incorporated as a town, which there is not just thing in Nevada. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home


 * They do not exist on state law. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home


 * Saying that thee are towns exist in Nevada violates WP:OR. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home 12:26, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * They problem is what is a definition of a town? By state law there is no clear definition of a town. Maybe the category should retiled Category:Places in Nevada with town boards? Most CDP's in Nevada and some unincorporated places have town boards or homeowners association. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home


 * Fair, but User:Nyttend said that the town of Indian Springs is "A CDP, not a town". Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bombsite


The article Bombsite has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article has been an unreferenced stub for almost 6 years now. There is no indication of notability of the topic, and the author's claim of relevance of such sites to the psycho-social outlook of post-war Europe is not supported by references, leading to the conclusion that it essentially original research.  The only improvement in the article in 6 years has been some modifications in tagging, but the original text remains essentially unchanged.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:IT 1971-09-09 B-IT-Volume-1 Iss-112 020-clip.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IT 1971-09-09 B-IT-Volume-1 Iss-112 020-clip.jpg, which you've sourced to International Times. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 16:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Audio theatre
Hi, I am a person from Germany. Possibly you can look on the discussion of the article: Audio theatre, because you have made edits in the past on articles which are related with it. with friendly greetings, Soenke --Soenke Rahn (talk) 23:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Books.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Books.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 00:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Erdős–Bacon number for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erdős–Bacon number is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Erdős–Bacon number until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DreamGuy (talk) 01:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

File:IT 1971-09-09 B-IT-Volume-1 Iss-112 020-clip.jpg
Hi. If you have a question about why OTRS didn't accept this image, please place it at commons:Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Otherwise, we can't just keep it around forever on the idea the OTRS is pending. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:29, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. I've given up on beating my head against the brick wall of Wikipedia's system for getting images accepted. The image in question was was made available by the copyright owners for public usage and I also emailed the copyright owner and got an email back confirming permission to use the image in Wikipedia. I forwarded the email to the appropriate department in Wikipedia but it still wasn't sufficient to be accepted. I guess if somebody has decided to be obstinate about it then no amount of authorisation is ever going to be sufficient. I certainly have better things to do with my time than keep repeating over and over that usage of this image is permitted by the owner.


 * With no animosity whatsoever but a great deal of regret,
 * Sincerely,
 * --wayland (talk) 01:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

It was insufficient because of WP:CSD - "for use on Wikipedia" isn't sufficient authorization, because Wikipedia licenses itself under GFDL and/or cc-by-sa-3.0-migrated. The idea behind Wikipedia is that anyone can copy it and use it for their purposes. If we have an image that is OK "for use on Wikipedia," then people aren't allowed to copy and use it for their purposes. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Books.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Books.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. When you recently edited Genre-busting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dambusters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sandman (DC Comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pulp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 400 (number), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Interpretation (version 2) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interpretation (version 2). Since you had some involvement with the Interpretation (version 2) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Interpretation (linguistics) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interpretation (linguistics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Interpretation (linguistics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Religious communism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Religious communism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Religious communism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 18:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Tinder
===Your message is in error. I did not create that page, nor have have I ever contributed to that page. Further, I have no knowledge of the "Tinder" app or its functions. wayland (talk) 09:19, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Political Game Theory


The article Political Game Theory has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Promotional. No references except its own web site.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you want the stub moved to draft space? Otherwise either I or someone else may nominate it for deletion.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Erdős–Bacon number for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erdős–Bacon number is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Erdős–Bacon number& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. L3X1 (distant write)  04:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

History of the Marranos in England
Hi Wayland. Just to let you know that I have tagged History of the Marranos in England as a copyright violation. I am supposed to notify the editor who created the article, which is you, but that was way back in 2004, and your edit summary suggests that you were just moving the text from another article, so I won't issue a warning but thought you might want to know. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, it looks like the source might be in the public domain. See Copyright problems/2017 November 10. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:33, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elastoplast


The article Elastoplast has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries, a bit more research and I found a source that seems sufficient to allow us to keep this as a stand-alone article . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madame X (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Comics ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Madame_X_%28disambiguation%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Madame_X_%28disambiguation%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

"Michael D. Horowitz" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Michael D. Horowitz. Since you had some involvement with the Michael D. Horowitz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 19:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

"Cynthia Palmer" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cynthia Palmer. Since you had some involvement with the Cynthia Palmer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 19:24, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Multivac


The article Multivac has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Artist's CD-ROM for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artist's CD-ROM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Artist's CD-ROM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marjorie Franklin


The article Marjorie Franklin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unclear notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe McNeill (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UCDavis Center for Animal Alternatives


A tag has been placed on UCDavis Center for Animal Alternatives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Throughthemind (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UCDavis Center for Animal Alternatives


The article UCDavis Center for Animal Alternatives has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Organization no longer seems to exist and is not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Throughthemind (talk) 09:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

"Alpha (computer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alpha (computer). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 21 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Matthew hk (talk) 08:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of History of modern literature for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of modern literature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/History of modern literature until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. asilvering (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Wayland Thank you for your response on this, by the way! Both for your good humour and good faith, and for the reminder of wikipedia's freewheeling, optimistic past. :) -- asilvering (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

"Intellectual centre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Intellectual centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 06:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Intellectual Centre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Intellectual Centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 06:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Three centres" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Three centres and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Five centres" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Five centres and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Five Centres" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Five Centres and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Three Centres" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Three Centres and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sexual Centre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sexual Centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Emotional Centre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Emotional Centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Moving Centre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Moving Centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Instinctive Centre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Instinctive Centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Thinking centre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thinking centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 20:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Law of Nine" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Law of Nine and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Glastonbury Assembly Rooms, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Glastonbury Assembly Rooms where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 17:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Glastonbury Assembly Rooms
Hello, Wayland. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Glastonbury Assembly Rooms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)