User talk:Waynequist

A tag has been placed on Den Svenska Evangeliska Lutherska Christdala Forsamlingen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 11:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Den Svenska Evangeliska Lutherska Christdala Forsamlingen is formally listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is a historically significant National Register property, so designated by the United Stated Department of Interior, U. S. Park Service.

Speedy deletion of Den Svenska Evangeliska Lutherska Christdala Forsamlingen
A tag has been placed on Den Svenska Evangeliska Lutherska Christdala Forsamlingen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Laaabaseball 11:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Den Svenska Evangeliska Lutherska Christdala Forsamlingen
A tag has been placed on Den Svenska Evangeliska Lutherska Christdala Forsamlingen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. OfficeGirl 11:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Panarin/Alaska
The material you just introduced to the lead paragraph inclueds WP:Synthesis based on Panarin's comments, which are also an interpretation of events and belong in their own section; "Russian dispute of sale" or some such. It doesn't belong in the intro paragraph; you might think so, because it's what YOU are primarily interested in; but it risks being ditched entirely if it's not added properly. I recommend you "move it down" and make only the briefest reference to the sale/lease dispute in the intro.Skookum1 (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Waynequist. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! &mdash;Elipongo (Talk contribs) 22:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Jesse James, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. &mdash;Elipongo (Talk contribs) 22:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * In addition:

Reference errors on 10 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Nicholas Gustafson page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=680414856 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F680414856%7CNicholas Gustafson%5D%5D Ask for help])