User talk:Waynewang45

Speedy deletion of HeatShift Technology
A tag has been placed on HeatShift Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | talk 08:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I've copied this paragraph from my talk page for your convenience.
 * Why not try to contribute a paragraph to Heat exchanger without mentioning the name, website, etc., of the company? If it's the METHOD that you're anxious to communicate, that would seem to be the way to do it, by clustering it with a bunch of other methods that do the same thing.  I'm not sufficiently versed in engineering matters to know whether that will work or not, but trying to create a separate article, based on what I see, is just about impossible -- unless you can find lots of independent expert third-party arm's-length opinion that verifies that the process is notable in a verifiable way, and manage to write the article without referring to the company that owns the process.  My recommendation would be to also try to create that paragraph without using your proprietary name for the process -- see if there's an abstract way that you can describe the process in a phrase, like "gel-based heat exchange".  I hope this helps; doubtless the people who work on Heat exchanger will be able to discuss this with your further in greater detail.  Accounting4Taste: talk 15:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)