User talk:WeWo-IASS

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark G. Lawrence (December 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Taewangkorea were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark G. Lawrence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark G. Lawrence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mark_G._Lawrence Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Taewangkorea&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mark_G._Lawrence reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taewangkorea (talk) 21:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Mark G. Lawrence concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mark G. Lawrence, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mark G. Lawrence


Hello, WeWo-IASS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark G. Lawrence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mark G. Lawrence has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark G. Lawrence. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Paid editing?
Hello WeWo-IASS. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WeWo-IASS. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Reply: Paid editing
 * Hello Theoradislong, thanks for your message. I am an employee at the IASS but am not receiving direct compensation for writing the article about Mark G. Lawrence. Since it is common practice for scientific directors (see O. Edenhofer, C. Rubbia, P. Nanz or countless others) to have english Wikipedia pages written about them in a similar manner, I had assumed that it is valid for the interested public to be informed about the director of a nonprofit research institute in Germany and wanted to contribute by writing this article. Please let me know how I should proceed from here, I am still new to Wikipedia. Thanks! WeWo-IASS (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * As an employee, you are deemed to be a paid editor and must make the required disclosure as directed above. Theroadislong (talk) 19:00, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help, I have updated my user page as you suggested. WeWo-IASS (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark G. Lawrence (July 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scorpions13256 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark G. Lawrence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark G. Lawrence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mark_G._Lawrence Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpions13256&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mark_G._Lawrence reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft
I am just letting you know that I declined your draft. The only problem with the article is that it needs to be rewritten to sound more neutral. Thank you for addressing the problems with sourcing, and I hope to see this article published soon. Feel free to ping me when you rewrite this. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)