User talk:WealthTrust-Arizona

Welcome!

Hello, WealthTrust-Arizona, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:WealthTrust-Arizona, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  BarkingFish 23:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:WealthTrust-Arizona


A tag has been placed on User:WealthTrust-Arizona, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  BarkingFish 23:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of WealthTrust-Arizona


A tag has been placed on WealthTrust-Arizona, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 18:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

A few points
Hi there, I just wanted to clarify a few things regarding the recent deletion nomination.

First of all, WealthTrust-Arizona does not appear to be notable enough for inclusion in wikipedia. For a full explanation of notability, see here. For a basic overview of wikipedia's general notability guideline, see here.

As there's no good reason according to wikipedia guidelines for WealthTrust-Arizona to have its own wikipedia article, the only remaining reason for it to be here is pure promotion of the company. This is contrary to wikipedia policy, which is why it has been nominated for speedy deletion under speedy deletion criterion G11.

Secondly, your username is in contravention of wikipedia's username policy. Specifically see the section about usernames consisting of company names. To fix this, please go here and log a request to change your username.

Finally, if an article you created has been speedily deleted in the past (which appears to be the case here), please refrain from stubbornly recreating it unless the reasons behind the original deletion have changed considerably (for example, if the company has become notable since the last deletion). If you continue to recreate the article, this may be seen as disruptive and you may be blocked from editing. I don't mean this to sound like intimidation or a threat, I'm just trying to help you out.

Hope this helps. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask me at my talk page. Regards Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 18:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Peridon (talk) 19:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:WealthTrust-Arizona


A tag has been placed on User:WealthTrust-Arizona, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I've changed the tag to non-notability. It will probably be deleted. Your wording was pretty neutral, but I'm not so sure about your intentions. As I can't see them, I've only blocked you for a username that appears to represent a company. I would warn you that if you get unblocked for a change of name, the unblocking admin will more than likely warn you not to edit about a business you are involved with. In the meantime, I would advise reading WP:CORP about corporate notability (which was failed), WP:RS about reliable independent sources (not even unreliable ones seen...), WP:COI concerning editing about you and yours, and just in case, WP:SPAM. Peridon (talk) 19:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WealthTrust-Arizona


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WealthTrust-Arizona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fumitol &#124;talk &#124;cont 18:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)