User talk:Weareworking

June 2023
Hello, I'm ARandomName123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Virtual assistant (occupation) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Sir,
 * Can you please unlock my IP. This was my first time and I mistakenly made such name and put the edit. In future, I will be careful. Weareworking (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, please follow the instructions in the notice below. ARandomName123 (talk) 20:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * Hi Deepfriedokra,
 * This was my first time to work on Wikipedia. I never knew that I made a account with wrong username. Can you please fix my account. I will take care in future.
 * Thanks. 154.192.144.2 (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Sir,
 * I totally understand this for now and there is no such intentions to promote our website. As I indicated earlier that I am a newbie and never did this before. If promotion was the intention, I would have accepted my mistake but I totally mis-understood.
 * If you find any such activity from from this account again in future, then you can permanently block my account. I believe, due to my wrong understanding I did such edit and doing commitment that I will not repeat.
 * This is a kind request to please allow my account.
 * Regards
 * Ali Weareworking (talk) 18:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Weareworking (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

You cannot make edits that are ultimately self-serving. You were linking to your website, where you sell services to customers. This isn't allowed.

In addition, your edits were a direct copy-and-paste from your website, which is a copyright violation. You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia - even if you are the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder's permission - unless the material has been released for use by the verified copyright owner into the public domain or under a license compatible with Wikipedia. These licenses allow anyone — not just Wikipedia — to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt your work, free of charge and in perpetuity, provided that you are attributed as the author. Also, because some derivative works may be commercial, we cannot accept materials that are licensed only for educational use or even for general non-commercial use. Releasing the material is both permanent and irrevocable.

To be blunt, you won't be unblocked if your intention is to write about your company, at least in the short term. The only way your unblock will be considered is if you commit to editing topics that are unrelated to your conflict of interest, build up a useful edit history, and gain a good understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I hereby commit that I will only be be doing editing of topics that are unrelated to my conflict of interest.
 * I also make sure to read every guideline before posting or editing anything. This was my first time and I will make sure that not to repeat this again. Weareworking (talk) 18:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Does this user need to open a new unblock request? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think they should probably post a new unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 15:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * You need to post a new unblock-spamun unblock request, since your last one was declined. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi,

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=hasnainkhan1947 | reason= As a newbie I commit the mistake by doing edit in a wrong manner. I will be careful in future as requested above. Weareworking (talk) 19:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Violating Wikipedia's copyright policy when answering a question is not great. Responses should not violate that policy. Z1720 (talk) 13:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)}} What topics do you want to edit about? 331dot (talk) 23:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I am a digital marketer. I have experience in SEO, PPC, Fb Ads, content writing, copywriting, linkedIn Ads.
 * If I find anything related to this and I find I have more accurate information. Then I will submit my request as per rules and books. Weareworking (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)


 * To be clear, we do not rely on the personal knowledge or experience of our users about a topic. We rely on information about a topic that has already been published in reliable sources, so any content you write has to be properly cited to those sources. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok sure. As I confirmed above that I will be following the rules as per book. Is there any chance that my IP and account get unblocked?
 * Thanks Weareworking (talk) 10:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * As you have an account, focus on getting your account unblocked and forget about your IP. Attempting to edit via IP is block evasion while your account is blocked. The autoblock on the underlying IP will be removed when the block on this account is removed. We need more than a committment from you to observe our policies- many people who say they will observe policies do not understand them and then go on to do the same thing wrong that they did before.
 * If you are a digital marketer, editing in that topic area would be a conflict of interest. We want to first see you edit in areas unrelated to your conflict of interest to demonstrate your knowledge of policies- like Joe Biden or science or the history of your country. Are there any topics that you want to edit about that are unrelated to your conflict of interest? 331dot (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * That will be great, I have interest in my country politics, tourism and sports specially cricket.I can do that.
 * Regards
 * Ali 154.192.145.24 (talk) 13:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * That will be great, I have interest in my country politics, tourism and sports specially cricket.I can do that.
 * Regards
 * Ali Weareworking (talk) 13:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

{{outdent}} Thanks for answering the questions above. In order for me to feel comfortable in unblocking you, please answer the following questions: I look forward to your responses. Z1720 (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) What is a conflict of interest on Wikipedia? (WP:COI and WP:COIE have information about this)
 * 2) How can editors request edits to article in which they have a conflict of interest? (WP:ER has information about this)
 * 3) What is promotional language and why is it not allowed on Wikipedia? WP:PROMO
 * 4) If I unblocked you, you would be prevented from editing any article related to WeAreWorking. Do you accept this condition?


 * 1.What is a conflict of interest on Wikipedia?
 * A conflict of interest (COI) on Wikipedia refers to a situation where someone contributes to Wikipedia about themselves, family, friends, clients, employers, or any of their financial or other external relationships. Any such external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest. It is important to note that having a conflict of interest is a description of a situation and is not a judgment about an individual's opinions, integrity, or good faith. COI editing can undermine public confidence in the encyclopedia and potentially cause embarrassment to the individuals or companies involved. It's strongly discouraged to engage in COI editing on Wikipedia because editors with a COI may not realize the extent of influence it has on their contributions. If such editing causes disruption, administrators can take actions, including placing blocks on involved accounts. Furthermore, those with a COI, especially paid editors, are expected to disclose it if they intend to make changes to an affected article. Anyone editing for payment needs to reveal who's paying them, the client, and any other pertinent affiliation, as mandated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Direct editing of articles by those with a COI is highly discouraged. Instead, they should propose changes on the article's talk pages. However, when it concerns living individuals, very clear errors can be corrected promptly, even by the subject. Lastly, the privacy of editors is crucial; thus, when investigating COI editing, one should not disclose the identity of editors against their wishes. Wikipedia's anti-harassment policy, especially the rule against revealing personal information, is paramount.
 * 2. How can editors request edits to articles in which they have a conflict of interest?
 * Editors wishing to request edits to an article in which they have a conflict of interest should follow these steps:
 * Propose the specific change on the article's talk page. At this stage, they shouldn't add an edit request template yet.
 * If the proposed change is likely to be controversial, they should wait until there is consensus for the change and any final details have been agreed upon.
 * Once there's agreement or if the change is uncontroversial, they can add an appropriate edit request template to the talk page, accompanied by a brief and clear explanation of the requested change.
 * A user who is able to make the edit will see the template and respond to the request.
 * For uncontroversial changes that don't require sourcing (e.g., fixing typos or disambiguating links), the editor doesn't need to wait for consensus. They can simply propose the change as described in the first step.
 * It's important to ensure clarity in the edit request and, if possible, provide the exact change desired to expedite the process.
 * 3. Promotional Language and Why It's Not Allowed on Wikipedia:
 * Promotional language refers to content that is written in a manner that advertises, markets, or showcases a subject, often in a biased or non-objective way. On Wikipedia, this can encompass advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind, whether it's commercial, political, scientific, religious, or any other type. Furthermore, it can manifest in self-promotion, where individuals or entities might be tempted to write about themselves or projects with which they have a close personal involvement, which may not adhere to Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and verifiability.
 * Wikipedia prohibits promotional language for several reasons:
 * Maintaining Neutrality: Wikipedia's primary goal is to provide objective and factual information. Promotional content violates the site's core principle of presenting a neutral point of view.
 * Avoiding Biases: Promotional content can introduce biases, favoring the subject being promoted at the expense of a fair and balanced portrayal.
 * Ensuring Verifiability: Promotional material may not always be verifiable through independent, third-party sources, which is a key requirement for content on Wikipedia.
 * Protecting Reputation: Promotional content, especially if unverified or biased, can harm Wikipedia's reputation as a trustworthy source of knowledge.
 * Avoiding Conflicts of Interest: Content that promotes a specific entity or individual can introduce conflicts of interest, where editors might have a personal or financial stake in the subject they're writing about.
 * In short, Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy, advertisements, or subjective opinions. It is designed to be an encyclopedia, providing factual and neutral information to its readers, free from promotional intent and biases.
 * 4. If I unblocked you, you would be prevented from editing any article related to WeAreWorking. Do you accept this condition?
 * "Yes, I accept the condition and will refrain from editing any article related to WeAreWorking." Weareworking (talk) 11:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You changed a few words but your answer to the first question is almost directly copied from WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 12:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * Please see my revised version. It is kindly requested to unblock my account. I have been requesting from last one month and now I fully understood the ethics of WikiPedia.
 * Conflict of interest (COI) editing on Wikipedia arises when contributors have personal or financial ties that could compromise their impartiality. Such relationships may include relationships with relatives, friends, employers, customers, or others. COI changes are strongly discouraged, as they can undermine public trust and can cause embarrassment to those involved. Editors with COI may not understand the extent of their biases, and any pesky COI editing can lead to account blockage. COI editors, including paid editors, have a duty to express an interest in trying to exchange relevant information. Editing directly should be avoided and changes should be proposed in talk pages instead. If adjustments are needed, especially for normal individuals, only obvious errors should be corrected by the subject. It is important for editors at COI to be transparent, avoid editing or creating stories about themselves or their close associates, make evidence-based recommendations, and communicate back with neutral editors have been reviewed.
 * Highlights:
 * It is possible to contribute to Wikipedia which may be biased due to personal or financial dealings in exchanging COIs.
 * Such repairs are strictly discouraged as they may undermine public confidence and prevent the audit. Editors at COI should express interest and suggest changes to the talk pages rather than edit the accompanying text directly.
 * COI editors should be transparent, make evidence-based recommendations, and seek unbiased research to ensure accuracy and impartiality. Weareworking (talk) 13:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi all,
 * As I have already responded to the question and agreed to my mistake. Can any here unblock my account. I have been requesting this for quite a long time but not getting any response from anyone.
 * In short, Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy, advertisements, or subjective opinions. It is designed to be an encyclopedia, providing factual and neutral information to its readers, free from promotional intent and biases.
 * 4. If I unblocked you, you would be prevented from editing any article related to WeAreWorking. Do you accept this condition?
 * "Yes, I accept the condition and will refrain from editing any article related to WeAreWorking." Weareworking (talk) 11:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You changed a few words but your answer to the first question is almost directly copied from WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 12:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * Please see my revised version. It is kindly requested to unblock my account. I have been requesting from last one month and now I fully understood the ethics of WikiPedia.
 * Conflict of interest (COI) editing on Wikipedia arises when contributors have personal or financial ties that could compromise their impartiality. Such relationships may include relationships with relatives, friends, employers, customers, or others. COI changes are strongly discouraged, as they can undermine public trust and can cause embarrassment to those involved. Editors with COI may not understand the extent of their biases, and any pesky COI editing can lead to account blockage. COI editors, including paid editors, have a duty to express an interest in trying to exchange relevant information. Editing directly should be avoided and changes should be proposed in talk pages instead. If adjustments are needed, especially for normal individuals, only obvious errors should be corrected by the subject. It is important for editors at COI to be transparent, avoid editing or creating stories about themselves or their close associates, make evidence-based recommendations, and communicate back with neutral editors have been reviewed.
 * Highlights:
 * It is possible to contribute to Wikipedia which may be biased due to personal or financial dealings in exchanging COIs.
 * Such repairs are strictly discouraged as they may undermine public confidence and prevent the audit. Editors at COI should express interest and suggest changes to the talk pages rather than edit the accompanying text directly.
 * COI editors should be transparent, make evidence-based recommendations, and seek unbiased research to ensure accuracy and impartiality. Weareworking (talk) 13:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi all,
 * As I have already responded to the question and agreed to my mistake. Can any here unblock my account. I have been requesting this for quite a long time but not getting any response from anyone.
 * It is possible to contribute to Wikipedia which may be biased due to personal or financial dealings in exchanging COIs.
 * Such repairs are strictly discouraged as they may undermine public confidence and prevent the audit. Editors at COI should express interest and suggest changes to the talk pages rather than edit the accompanying text directly.
 * COI editors should be transparent, make evidence-based recommendations, and seek unbiased research to ensure accuracy and impartiality. Weareworking (talk) 13:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi all,
 * As I have already responded to the question and agreed to my mistake. Can any here unblock my account. I have been requesting this for quite a long time but not getting any response from anyone.

{{unblock-spamun reviewed|alihasnain1947|I have answered the questions and understood my mistake and agreed to the solution Weareworking (talk) 06:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)|decline=Closing as stale- you may make a new request; I would suggest that it might help if you gave an example of a specific edit you would make that is completely unrelated to your conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 07:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)}}