User talk:Weasel2000


 * }

-- Bduke   (Discussion)  23:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Good to read your talk page. Scouting in Canada articles do need some work. I suggest you take a look at the US articles and then those for the UK and Australia. I think all three are rather more complete than Canada, but they still need work. There has been a shortage of editors on both UK and Australia Scouting articles in recent years. Seeing how others do, and those three countries do it slightly differently, can give you ideas. Use the country Scouting category to see what exists. Good luck. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  22:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dorchester International Brotherhood Camp


A tag has been placed on Dorchester International Brotherhood Camp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. red dog  six  (talk) 02:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dorchester International Brotherhood Camp


A tag has been placed on Dorchester International Brotherhood Camp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. red dog  six  (talk) 17:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

The deleting admin has restored the article after I suggested to him that it was not identical to the article deleted in 2009. It is now up to you demonstrate notability by finding reliable independent sources that have reported on these camps in detail. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  22:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it was unwise of you to add back all the material that the admin who deleted it it, then restored it, and then prod'ed it, thought was trivial. It really is trivial. It needs to be drastically cut back, and remove all the links to badges. However, what it really needs to stop it being deleted is the addition of reliable independent sources. I have added one, but it a rather weak. It needs more and I can not find more. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  00:02, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asshole (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 18:52, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Asshole (disambiguation) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. MJ94 (talk) 21:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)