User talk:WeatherGuy0123

March 2023
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sheridan, Wyoming, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Not vandalism. I am a climatologist. WeatherGuy0123 (talk) 01:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * And I live in Sheridan. If you dont and I'm betting you don't I would strongly advise to do climate research. WeatherGuy0123 (talk) 01:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Whoever edited it last didn't get their info from a reliable source. You have two choices, we can talk like adults or I re edit. Choice is yours WeatherGuy0123 (talk) 01:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Two can't talk like adults if the first one doesn't start by talking like one. Also, there's no reason why Bbb would know that you were talking. The info in the article, apparently, comes from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration--so that's reliable. If you are going to change numbers in an article without providing a source for those numbers, you're always going to be reverted. Drmies (talk) 01:48, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * uh yes from an old site that is only record keeping part of the time. Got my info from the NWS.
 * I provided that source the other day. 184.167.93.135 (talk) 01:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's not a good idea to edit logged out once you have a named account.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 03:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * So you block people for editing wrong info with correct info? WeatherGuy0123 (talk) 03:55, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * And I listed my source. Is the NWS not good enough? WeatherGuy0123 (talk) 03:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Gonna help me out or not? WeatherGuy0123 (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Twice when you changed the climate material you mentioned the National Weather Service. Perhaps that's what you mean by "I listed my source". That's no different from saying here, as you did, that you obtained the temperature data from the NWS. The climate data must be sourced, not mentioned/listed. For example, in the Sheridan, Wyoming article below the climate table, there are four references, currently numbered 21-24. Each of those points to NOAA data; as an illustration, reference #21 has a link to this page. If you hadn't been so uncollaborative and difficult, you could have at least tried to learn how to edit Wikipedia, as opposed to charging in here and changing sourced content to unsourced content, even after being reverted and warned to stop.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:07, 9 March 2023 (UTC)