User talk:Weavale

Panda weaver
I have added a "" template to the article Panda weaver, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Sam Blacketer 13:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I have edited the page and I hope that it meets Wikipedia standards. If not, tell me what I need to change, or change it yourself. Thanks Weavale 13:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I have put the tag back in for your own warning. Read the warning carefully. The article may still be deleted as it looks like cleverly crafted spam to me. — Nazrila 13:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for responding, Weavale. However I don't feel that my concerns have been met yet. Firstly I take a look at your user name and wonder whether you are the creator of the site writing about your own work? If so, please see the conflict of interest guidelines. The second issue is the opening sentence of the article which says that the article is about the creator of the site, while the rest of the article deals with the site itself.


 * Wikipedia only carries articles on notable things (see What Wikipedia is not) and there is a guideline for whether websites are notable which is found at WP:WEB. There are several ways given there which say how notability of the website can be established. Can you say whether it meets any of them? Sam Blacketer 13:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I have tried to make the article as neutral as possible, and I believe that I have confromed to your requests. If you feel that the article still is not good enough then please put back in the request for deletion in the article and post here what you think needs changing. Thanks for your help. Weavale 15:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)