User talk:Web2.0contributor

David Haye
Greetings. It was not my intention to undo your contributions during my copyedits, but I did have an issue with the part about Haye being an undisputed champion. Unified, yes, but since he did not hold the IBF title he cannot be labelled as such, in the same way that Joe Calzaghe was not truly an undisputed champion when he only held the WBA/WBC/WBO super middleweight titles; the IBF was missing.

Granted, I have heard of some outlets simplifying the term "undisputed" to mean three out of the four titles, but then it becomes a case of whose terminology are we to follow. A contemporary, present-day example would be Wladimir Klitschko: he is still missing one title, thus most outlets refrain from calling him the undisputed heavyweight champion. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Salter Brothers Entertainment


A tag has been placed on Salter Brothers Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Gabe Turner Head Shot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gabe Turner Head Shot.png, which you've attributed to http://fulwell73.com/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Salter Brothers Entertainment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salter Brothers Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Salter Brothers Entertainment (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tacyarg (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2018 (UTC)