User talk:WebGoddess83

Warning Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from a Wikipedia article. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.58.113.37 (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Edit request
Please remove COI

Was not aware of procedure to declare COI in edit request. I added references which I believe support this article and keep it factual. WebGoddess83 (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi WebGoddess83. Sorry, the article definitely still needs cleanup given its current state. The purpose of the COI tag is to alert readers and Wikipedia editors that an article is not neutrally written and has been heavily influenced by a contributor with a conflict of interest. Given that most of the current article was written by you, and has not been significantly modified since, and contains promotional phrases such as "Dowrick has been described as a 'pioneering individual'", the article needs additional monitoring. Adding references does help, but the article needs to have a much more neutral tone. Thanks, Altamel (talk) 01:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, WebGoddess83. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Stephanie Dowrick, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Fylbecatulous talk 13:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)