User talk:WebHubTel

Nigelj removed the valuable addition I made to the Peak Oil page on 1/23/2011. Complaint that Logistic criticism was in the lede, while that was the only place that Logistic appeared. Also complained that the book link was on a private blog!

WebHubTel (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC) I added a variation on 1/25/2011 WebHubTel (talk) 03:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add self published sources as references, it violates wp:SPS.LeadSongDog come howl!  06:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I have spent the last five years working on the book, having gone through peer review as blog posts. This is not self-published, it is published by GoogleDocs. What is Wikipedia but self-published? What about all those vanity publishers like Regnery and World Net Daily that use it to push an agenda? WebHubTel (talk) 13:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I detect some hypocrisy. The main figure shows a plot of various models of the peak oil curve. One of those models (Shock Model) is the one I solely developed and described in my book. WebHubTel (talk) 02:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Context model (October 3)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Context&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Context model (October 26)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 15:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Context model concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Context model, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)