User talk:Web Lord

Link spam
This message is regarding the page Billie Piper. Please do not add commercial links &mdash; or links to your own private websites &mdash; to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. Note that Wikipedia may see print or DVD publication, so we want more content, not more web links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 22:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla 22:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

This is not a commercial link or my own site. Please, take at least one minute to see the website before erase it. :)

WebLord

Please, Yamla don't be vandalist. I will report you if you continue be a vandalist.


 * In what way am I vandalising anything? --Yamla 23:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

This website was accepted from October 2005 by Wikipedia and it was erased for a vandalist Spanish guy from 157.88.86.107. Please, block him and read the history. Ok?


 * You asked about WP:EL. The link is already given above.  Here it is again.  Additionally, you may want to read WP:NOT to see what other things Wikipedia is not.  Do not add that link back to the page or you will be blocked for link spamming after multiple warnings. --Yamla 23:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, the site was erased by someone at 157.88.86.107. That person did the Wikipedia a favour as the site failed the WP:EL test.  The fact that the site was on the page since October 2005 is unimportant.  --Yamla 23:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Web Lord


 * I have and it fails the WP:EL test. Just because it is not commercial does not mean it is reasonable to link in.  --Yamla 23:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

If you see the WP:EL says fansites are accepted. Please, tell me where it fails the WP:EL if you have a reason of course because I doubt it. :)


 * That's not what it says. It says one major fansite is occasionally appropriate.  Please do not misquote.  In what way is that site a "major fansite"?  Furthermore, the site requires external applications ("links to normally avoid") and does not seem to provide a significant unique resource beyond the article itself ("links to normally avoid").  --Yamla 23:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Web Lord

If you refeer to the news published there they have a link to the sources. Register to their forum and see it. In addition their site says "UNOFFICIAL" Billie Piper Website. I hope you understand what "UNOFFICIAL" means. :)

Believe me, I don't want to be a vandalist. I just want to add this link again because a spanish vandalist visitor of Wikipedia is erasing their site because he's doing a boicot against this site. In addition, I recommend you to see other fansites like Billie-Piper.net because maybe you should erase it. Look at the history, they original link said "OFFICIAL" and they never were an "OFFICIAL" site. I'm a real Billie Piper fan and I know that Billie Piper don't have an OFFICIAL site at this moment.

If you are still thinking that BilliePiper.com.ar violates any policy please give a detailed report and I will send an e-mail to the owners of this website to correct it.

Web Lord


 * I've told you the various ways why the website is not acceptable here at Wikipedia. It will continue to be reverted if you insist on adding it back.  Please feel free to remove any other pieces of link spam from the Billie Piper article if you wish, once your block expires.  The block was for 24 hours but if you promise not to add the site back, I can unblock you immediately.  --Yamla 23:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

I tell you again, please help me to see what in BilliePiper.com.ar is violating the policy and I will tell them. In adittion, I recommend you to see their site again and you will see that they aren't vandalist too. Please, check Billie-Piper.net too they aren't a major fansite :)

Web Lord


 * Look, I've already told you several times. The site is not the preeminent Billie Piper fansite.  In fact, it doesn't really appear to be a major fansite, to be honest.  It requires external applications.  It does not provide a significant unique resource beyond the article itself.  If you feel the site does not fit these criteria, please justify specifically in what way.  Fansites are generally frowned upon on Wikipedia, however, so it'll need to be a compelling justification.  If you aren't going to get to specific justifications, though, then please stop wasting my time.  I've also already told you about Billie-Piper.net.  Feel free to remove this site when you are unblocked, it may be a good idea if that site is indeed not official.  On the other hand, at least that site doesn't require Flash to view the content.  --Yamla 23:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

BilliePiper.com.ar only have their introduction in Flash and if you see they have an html link (outside the Flash) at the bottom saying "Skip Intro" in their introduction. Check in Google too, write "BilliePiper.com.ar" and you can find 10 pages with links to their site, check their stats (Globe icon). If you check things like this you will see the Billie Piper fans like me consider their site as a major fansite and I'm sure that other Billie Piper will add this site again soon. In addition, browsers like Internet Explorer have Macromedia Flash included.

Web Lord


 * Nevertheless, it's enough to disqualify the site. Furthermore, MSIE does not have Macromedia Flash included (though it's easy to add), nor would this be relevant.  The site doesn't get updated very often and the chat board is basically dead.  Finally, the up-and-down arrows don't work in either of the browsers I've tried, making the site's contents inaccessible in many browsers.  The site is inappropriate to link in to the Billie Piper article and that's the end of it.  --Yamla 00:10, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Go to the guestbook and forum and tell is they're dead too. I'm seeing that you don't know what to say me and you're writing only excuses. :)

Please Yamla, don't be a vandalist. In addition, I can't believe what you can postulate to Admin. Oh My God!!! I'm sure that Wikipedia go down with Admins like you. :(

Please!!! Take a lesson how to navigate in internet asap. Thanks God you know what is a computer. :)

Web Lord

Hey Yamla, I'm still waiting for your reply. Please, reply me.

Web Lord

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 23:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Yamla 23:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Link spam - Billie Piper
Hi there, thanks for your interest in my comments on 201.231.154.8's talk page. If you know that some of the other links are fake, please feel free to help out by removing them as well. I'm not sure how you managed to come to the conclusion that I "only remove useful things" - I would be impressed if you scanned through all of my past edits in such a short time! -- Chuq (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I just read your Wikipedia space and I follow the Billie Piper history to see your work there. BTW, Wikipedia allow to promote fansites as official sites? I just ask you because Billie-Piper.net is just a fansite but it's on the top of the article as her "official site".

I forgot... two more questions: Can you explain why you consider BilliePiper.com.ar as a linkspam? Did you visit the site at least one time to check if the site deserve a place in wikipedia?


 * Please see WP:SPAM and WP:EL. --Yamla 14:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)