User talk:Webeditor2019

February 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed the username choice. It seems okay. However, you stated in your edit summary "Relevant legal procedures have been initiated". That means legal action is underway, at least as far as Wikipedia is concerned. You will also need to review the policies I have indicated; someone else will formally review your request. 331dot (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

To clarify, it's up to you and your organization whether you take legal action or not; I and Wikipedia cannot offer legal advice; I am simply saying that if you do take legal action, you cannot edit Wikipedia until it is resolved. 331dot (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

globally renamed Gujarat Samachar Official to Webeditor2019
globally renamed Gujarat Samachar Official to Webeditor2019 Dloh cier ekim    (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your original username indicated you are the official representative of your newspaper; if so, you must comply with the paid editing policy, you do not have to be specifically paid to edit Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
Even if you unequivocally withdraw the legal threat-- which you have not done-- I would not unblock you without a WP:TBAN on Gujarat Samachar. You cannot have a username like "Gujarat Samachar Official" and persuade me you are not editing on behalf of Gujarat Samachar and you cannot persuade me you are not receiving some compensation of some sort for so doing. Please tell us what other areas you will edit about. Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Furthermore, "legal action has not been taken, but we are considering the same", tells me you are more involved with Gujarat Samachar than you claim. WE? Ya got a mouse in your pocket? Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

I think you have not properly read the threads. Sorry. I have clearly wrote that I am an employee of Gujarat Samachar Group. But I am a designer and I DONOT GET paid for writing on wiki. I have worked in 7 news channels all round India and not only in Gujarat Samachar. My ethics after a decade of working in media is by nature un-bias. I clearly also mentioned that COI is a valid point, but did you take time to see the edits I did on the page? Each of them has been cited with proper official documents. There is no bloated claims or promotions. I could have easily wrote a much longer article with the data I have. But I specifically refrained from doing it as it may coheres my judgement. If I had a bad motive I wouldn't be disclosing my identity as Gujarat Samachar Official id rather I will be using a IP mask and some shady techniques to edit the page. You can even hire editor freelancer over web to edit your pages who have credible profiles. You know that very well, and we being in media know that too. My motive was very clear someone was GRAVELY misusing the platform and using hate speech like ANTI-NATIONAL, so I thought of editing it. Once I came to know of the system, I found it's very interesting and I can contribute in general, not only for this page.

So there is NO MOUSE IN MY POCKET! I am this clear. You are veteran editors. Please show/guide me where a single line which I wrote on my edits to the page is baseless. It will help me lean. Please unblock me. I really have no alternate motive.
 * I say again: if you work for the newspaper or its owner, you must declare as a paid editor. You do not have to be specifically paid to edit Wikipedia.  It's unlikely you will be unblocked unless you agree to make that declaration.  Additionally, it does not help your case to state that you could use "shady techniques" to evade compliance with Wikipedia guidelines but have nicely decided not to do that.  You don't get brownie points for doing what you are supposed to do.  331dot (talk) 20:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Reply: I don’t expect a brownie point also. That was to justify my point that there is no mouse in my pocket!

The more constructive thing is, if you would kindly let me know what declaration I need to make. I will definitely do that. I have a great respect for Wiki. In our everyday coverage we all use wiki a1000 times. I will be honoured to be able to contribute even a drop in it.
 * Information about what you need to say is at WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 07:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

I read also those, and understood the context. But I can't understand how to technically write the disclosure. Can you please give me a sample. I only found a piece of code, which if written is causing error.
 * It will be sufficient for you to state something to the effect of "I am an employee of Gujarat Samachar Group". 331dot (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2019 (UTC)