User talk:Webgovernor

Proposed deletion of OCT Online
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article OCT Online, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Assize (talk) 14:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Clicking Bad"
A page you created, Clicking Bad, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.   &#127866;  Antiqueight  confer 22:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

It appears that the page is no longer up for deletion. I fail to see how, in any way, my page creation was "unambiguously promotional." Webgovernor (talk) 14:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Clicking Bad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clicking Bad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Clicking Bad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  — PinkAmpers  &#38;  ( Je vous invite à me parler )  08:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Clicking Bad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clicking Bad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Clicking Bad & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yaksar (let's chat) 07:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Clicking Bad listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Clicking Bad. Since you had some involvement with the Clicking Bad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paradoctor (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)