User talk:Webgrasp

Nomination of JoshCartu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JoshCartu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/JoshCartu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mean as custard (talk) 07:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to JoshCartu, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to JoshCartu has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to JoshCartu with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Shadowjams (talk) 19:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

March 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Banc de Binary, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  00:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

ANI Notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The relevant section is WP:ANI. Blackmane (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry investigation
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Reuvengrish. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)