User talk:Webguyrickidoo

Welcome!
Hello, Webguyrickidoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! - 2/0 (cont.) 19:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Reference Errors on 14 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Multiple chemical sensitivity page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=621236414 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F621236414%7CMultiple chemical sensitivity%5D%5D Ask for help])

Edit warring at Multiple chemical sensitivity
Your recent editing history at Multiple chemical sensitivity shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Note especially BRD above and follow it. Do not attempt to repeat your edits since they are contested. It is now time to follow the D (Discuss) in BRD. Start a discussion on the article's talk page and let's work this out. There are multiple issues with your edits. -- Brangifer (talk) 13:27, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Webguyrickidoo. I would recommend that you read WP:MEDRS thoroughly before making changes to the MCS article (your last edits broke MEDRS in a number of ways). Also you should discuss major changes in the talk page, especially if your edits get reverted. --sciencewatcher (talk) 15:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)