User talk:Webluq

A tag has been placed on Webluq, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Already exists under different name.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WEBURIEDOURSECRETS INTHEGARDEN  22:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Webluq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Carados (talk) 22:52, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Webluq
It is not within Wikipedia's interest to have two of every article, and Webluq - an article you keep recreating - is a clone of MySpace. Please stop this blatant vandalism. WEBURIEDOURSECRETS INTHEGARDEN  22:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 22:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -Carados (talk) 23:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Webluq logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Webluq logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Webluq
Hey, welcome to Wikipedia. A couple things I have to bother you with, sorry. First, I went ahead and deleted Webluq again, because it had been almost an hour and there was no explanation on the talk page about why you thought it did not meet the speedy deletion criterion. Note that all articles have to meet notability criteria, specifically WP:WEB for Internet stuff. You may also want to look at WP:COI.

The other thing is your username: Since it's the name of a company, it's not permissible under the username guidlines. Can you change it? You can either request to change it, or just register a new account if you don't care about keeping the contributions you have under this username (that would be easier). Please let me know on User talk:Delldot what you plan to do. I'm concerned because this username will likely be blocked as a username violation pretty soon. Thanks, sorry for the hassle. Peace, delldot   talk  00:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Eric Cartman do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SoSaysChappy (talk) 01:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)