User talk:Webreitek

Spam in Reitek
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Reitek, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Reitek is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Reitek, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot 15:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

spam
You work in the marketing department of Reitek S.p.A. To my simple mind, that means that anything you write here is essentially advertising (but we prefer to say that you "have a COI"). The recommendation is always, to let someone else write about you or your company. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

trying to make better
I’m sorry about my attempts on Wikipedia, probably this wasn't a good idea so thank you again for your hints (and I’m not so self-confident with HTML so I wrote directly to your email :) I agree with you: always let someone else write about me or about my company, in fact this is not the point in question.

I thought that relates with objectivity, although about a company, was allowed on Wikipedia: it’s full of examples everywhere. Please, check out the two links I sent you. It's evident. Maybe those companies have published their articles using third party user accounts? Is this the solution? I should check thousands of articles with a neutral language like mine and flag them as "blatant advertising"...

19:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC+1)
 * You need knowledge of HTML to produce nice e-mails. Wikipedia can be edited with about zero knowledge of HTML. Nellymoser has a notable product with its name on it. The Dylogic article has been edited by someone with an interest in other topics. OK, someone has removed the speedy tag. But given your blatant COI, I will send it to AfD. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)