User talk:Webverbesserer

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Chen (June 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keith Chen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Keith_Chen Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joseph2302&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Keith_Chen reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 18:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Keith Chen concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Keith Chen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Chen has been accepted
 Keith Chen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  23:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Keith_Chen help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Please cite when adding information
Hi. When adding information to articles, such as you did to the "Corlears Hook" section of Lower East Side, please add a citation from a reliable source to support the information. Material which is not supported by a citation is subject to removal, so using a cite is the best way to insure that the information is going to stay. IN this case, I was able to verify much of the information you added from a source available to me, but not the specific number of 30 natives killed. It would be good if you were to support that figure with a citation from a reliable source. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, throughout time "Corlear's Hook" has been spelled with "ea" and with "ae" and with and without the apostrophe. As far as I can tell, all are "correct", although the standard form these days is with "ea" and without the apostrophe, as in this official site for Corlears Hook Park. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I support deleting unsourced claims, and appreciate even more your self-revert, compensating for my negligence. Thank you. Have now added my source for the number in question.Webverbesserer (talk) 09:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gmp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, I'm SovalValtos. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Telford, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 06:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * There's a dedicated article on the Telford child sex abuse ring and yet you revert?? --Webverbesserer (talk) 08:19, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If Webverbesserer are going to wait several months to reply it would help if you were to ping the editor you are addressing. In your addition to Telford you added the opinion that it "gained international notoriety". Even in the Telford child sexual exploitation scandal article there are only local and  national sources. What is required is a reliable source supporting the assertion. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 11:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kalle Saksela
Hello, Webverbesserer,

Thank you for creating Kalle Saksela.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"For academics there should be evidence that their work is significant. More references are certainly needed here."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Sheraton Grand London Park Lane Hotel
 * added a link pointing to Richard Sutton
 * The Athenaeum Hotel
 * added a link pointing to Richard Sutton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jim Dilworth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Dilworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim Dilworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DocFreeman24 (talk) 06:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)