User talk:Wecarlisle

Welcome!
Hello, Wecarlisle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Neutralitytalk 01:17, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Newspaper endorsements in the United States presidential election, 2016 page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=744048852 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F744048852%7CNewspaper endorsements in the United States presidential election, 2016%5D%5D Ask for help])

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations
Please don't replace the summary table until there's clear consensus for restoration. Per WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE: if it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first. This article is covered under BLP Discretionary sanctions and American Politics Discretionary Sanctions. James J. Lambden (talk) 03:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations
Hi, I hope you're doing well today. I see that you have keen interest in providing content to Wikipedia articles, and of interest to me is your input to Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations. You may notice that a lot of your content is being reverted / removed. I think that is generally because the content is coming from unreliable sources.

If there's not a reliable source, then it's entirely possible that it's not been thoroughly fact-checked. I don't know if you added the info, but an example is Jennifer Murphy, who was added to the article using an unreliable source. She absolutely was not an accuser and was quite upset that she had been identified as one. She had been kissed by Trump, but had no issue with it. And, if the mainstream media isn't picking up a story, it speaks to the importance or lack of importance (not always, there's some stuff that they don't pick up that would be good - but it is a rule of thumb). Well, actually you might be able to speak to that better than me, based upon the articles that you contribute to.

Also, there is keen attention that we're receiving on POV, reliable sources, etc. issues. There have been a number of attempts to remove sections from the article or have it deleted entirely. That is why we're being hypervigilant on this article.

Anyway, I thought I'd drop by the list of reliable sources that we've identified - and the ones we're choosing not to use for this article - some of them because of POV concerns (Politico and Huffington Post come to mind). This may be a helpful guide for other articles that you contribute to.

Use:
 * Atlantic - RS
 * Business Insider - RS
 * CNN, CNN Money - RS
 * Deseret News - RS
 * Fox News - RS, preferred from previous discussion
 * Guardian - RS
 * Houston Public Media
 * Los Angeles Times - RS, preferred from previous discussion
 * NPR - RS, preferred from previous discussion
 * Network news: ABC, CBS, NBC - RS
 * New York Daily News - RS
 * New York Magazine - RS
 * New York Times - RS
 * Newsweek - RS
 * NPR - RS
 * Palm Beach Post - RS
 * People - RS
 * Rolling Stone - RS
 * Slate - RS
 * Time - RS
 * Variety - RS
 * VOX - RS
 * Washington Post - RS

Don't use or find a better source, based on RSN
 * Daily Beast - RS, but speculative opinion pieces
 * DailyMail - not RS
 * Donald J. Trump campaign site - better to get a secondary source.In cases where Trump's responses to specific allegations are present on his campaign site but not (within a reasonable time frame) covered in RS, we include his response noting that it came from the campaign site (added)
 * Huffington Post - RS, better to find another source
 * Independent - not RS
 * International Business Times - not clearly RS, better to find another source (added)
 * LawNews - not RS per RSN in this post (added)
 * Politico - RS, but better to find another source
 * Anything else not on the "use" list unless it's a known reliable source (search noticeboard)

I know it's long-winded!!!! But, I hope that some of this is helpful for you. Please feel free to ask questions on the Talk:Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations page or my user talk page.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 01:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Per your recent edit, please pay attention to the list provided by above. Also, please don't mark an edit as "minor" if you add content. "Minor" is for spelling errors and the like. Funcrunch (talk) 18:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your Trump content
Hello. Re this edit, you could have answered the "for some reason" by looking at the article's talk page. Or, failing to see the RfC there, simply starting a thread there to ask why the content was removed. This is the best approach for any article in a highly controversial area, and even more critical in an article under the ArbCom U.S. politics remedies stated at the top of the article's talk page. Happy editing! ― Mandruss  &#9742;  01:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
Certainly you are aware of the active arbitration remedies on Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations as there's an edit notice want them. To be clear, these acting remedied stem from the following arbitration decision.

 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement request notice
There is a request for arbitration enforcement oh discretionary sanctions at WP:AE regarding your edits.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

This makes no sense.

October 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing and edit warring on Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations after being advised and warned. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Please see WP:EW. FixCop (talk) 23:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shreveport Rafters FC has been accepted
 Shreveport Rafters FC, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Programming Geek  (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 16:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Orphaned non-free image File:Dakotafusionfclogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Dakotafusionfclogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Siouxfallsthunderfclogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Siouxfallsthunderfclogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017 NPSL season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of photovoltaic power stations under 100MW
I have listed an article that you started at Articles for deletion. Please join in the conversation on the link above. Rmhermen (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Duluth fc logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Duluth fc logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pdx fcl logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Pdx fcl logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Helengiulianiphoto.jpg


The file File:Helengiulianiphoto.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Corinthians fc of san antonio.png
Thanks for uploading File:Corinthians fc of san antonio.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fcarizonalogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fcarizonalogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Albionscproslogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Albionscproslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Boston city fc logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Boston city fc logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)