User talk:Wee Olly

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cat behavior, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cat behavior was changed by Wee Olly (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867492 on 2012-01-08T14:37:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. - Happysailor  (Talk) 14:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I LOVE PUPPIES AND KITTENS
hey

Wee Olly (talk) 17:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 

In response to your feedback
Thanks for your contribution and I'm sorry it was removed: everything on Wikipedia needs to be sourced to reliable sources (books, newspapers, high-quality trusted websites etc.). When editing Cat behavior, you need to try and be careful to make sure that it is sourced and written in an encyclopedic style rather than a how-to style.

—Tom Morris (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;