User talk:Weedbag

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! (Thunderclacker the F22 (talk) 07:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC))
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Sockpuppets? In my Wikipedia Talk Page? It's more likely then you think. Weedbag (talk) 02:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Jaysweet (talk) 19:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

If that is vandalism then any accusation of being a sockpuppet is vandalism (you sockpuppet) ZOMG YOU JUST VANDALIZED MUH PAGE Weedbag (talk) 19:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Wrong. You vandalized my User page User:Jaysweet].  I put a warning on your talk page [[User talk:Weedbag.  Put whatever you want on my talk page User talk:Jaysweet (of course if it is a personal attack, that will just get you blocked faster). --Jaysweet (talk) 19:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 19:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I was not throwing around accusations of sockpuppetry, and in fact my allegation against other sockpuppets was well-founded. The really damning thing about Weedbag is that he/she got upset about my allegations before I ever accused him/her of sockpuppetry:


 * my first accusation of sockpuppetry against Weedbag with timestamp 19:26
 * Weedbag's first complaint about my sockpuppetry allegations with timestamp 19:18

Maybe I am wrong, but it begs the question, why did Weedbag jump into Ma1kel's user talk page, especially when Ma1kel and EctoplasmOnToast are obvious sockpuppets? I don't get it. But hey, maybe I am wrong. Run a checkuser and we'll see. --Jaysweet (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Also, my report against Weedbag was because multiple accounts were making personal attacks against me on multiple pages at once (User talk:Ma1kel, User:Jaysweet, etc.) and I wanted it to stop. The fact that I suspected Weedbag of sockpuppetry was somewhat tangential to the AIV.  In retrospect, I actually no longer think Weedbag is a sockpuppet, I just think he/she made an inaccurate accusation against me (and I remain bewildered about his/her motives, but whatever...)
 * I am okay with lifting Weedbag's block or reducting the duration, on the condition that any contact with me in the future results in the indef block being reapplied. --Jaysweet (talk) 20:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The reason I was upset was not because you thought I was a sockpuppet ( I dont think you ever accused me of one) but because you accused user:Ma1kel] of being one, when he clearly was one of two trolls vandalizing [[Youtube. I agree, it was stupid of me to go off on you, I apologize, you had every right to do what you did. Weedbag (talk) 20:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * In any case, it's out of my hands now... --Jaysweet (talk) 20:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and once again, sorry for being a dumbass.Whoops, forgot my tildes Weedbag (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)