User talk:Weiji2001

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:DragonBlade.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DragonBlade.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PiliDragonBlade.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PiliDragonBlade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violation at Hsiung Shih-I
Your addition to Hsiung Shih-I has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Kokeshi
The archived link "Michelle Newman" should be removed. Kokeshi are not manufactured on Okinawa. There is a type of Okinawan wooden doll figure, but it is not a kokeshi. Also, her information on kokeshi origins is farfetched and simply wrong. Kokeshi were made by woodturners at the onsens in Tohoku. It was a simple invention of profitability when you couldn't make enough money selling wooden bowls and dishes to the tourists.

Here is a correct source of information from this link:

https://mingeiarts.com/discover/dolls-toys-ningyo-omocha/

All other links in the article appear to be dead except Jennifer McDowell, who is, by the way, the only kokeshi scholar in your set of links. It is an excellent source of information.

Here is another online article by her:

McDowell, Jennifer, Kokeshi: Shifting Signifiers and Wooden Tradition, 東北人類学論壇 Tohoku Anthropological Exchange 9:1-34(2010)

It is a downloadable PDF file

This link defines 'sosaku' kokeshi (not 'shingata' which is mentioned in the article and is somewhat confused with this term)

http://www.usaburo.com/en/about/index.html

You can also add as external links:

Kokeshi Wiki (Japanese only)          http://kokeshiwiki.com/

which provides very detailed information on kokeshi history and artisans.