User talk:Weimar03

Image tagging for Image:RIVERSIDE THEATRE 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE THEATRE 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 07:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET small ii.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET small ii.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mayalld 08:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET small ii.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET small ii.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mayalld 08:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET LARGE.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET LARGE.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 09:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

 Welcome

Hi ! welcome to Wikipedia!

Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use  ~  (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at New user log. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use New contributors' help page. You can also type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! utcursch | talk 16:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:COMEDY-OF-ERRORS-POSTER-3.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:COMEDY-OF-ERRORS-POSTER-3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quadell (talk • contribs) 14:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RIVERSIDE CAESAR PHOTO 105.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE CAESAR PHOTO 105.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Corrections to Riverside Shakespeare Company
Don't mention it. They were actually to The Shakespeare Center. (That might count as another correction! ;-) If you need any help, just ask. Chris the speller (talk) 02:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Dated cleanup tags
Hi, thanks for your message, SmackBot does not generally add tags, but merely dates those that are already there. In this case DanielRigal added the Tone. Regards,

The Winter's Tale
Thank you. I've copied your note to User talk:AndyJones rather than the archive.

Yes, I think you've sourced that very well, so I've removed the {unreferenced} tag. AndyJones (talk) 13:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:COHEN THE THEATRE.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:COHEN THE THEATRE.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP EBINGER & FABER LAST SHOT.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP EBINGER & FABER LAST SHOT.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Shakespeare
Thanks for the reply. I came across Riverside several times in the last few days and I wondered if someone from there was moving thru the WS articles inserting their name where ever possible. I'm all for clever advertising gimmicks, but I wanted to make sure someone wasn't using Wikipedia for that reason. Thanks again, and good work on the may articles you have contributed to. RE my other comment - don't think Ashland opened with R&J. Because of their proximity I know Monterey Shakespeare Fest, Shakespeare Santa Cruz and Carmel Shakespeare Fest did not.Smatprt (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I was wondering why I had not heard of them.  When did they go out of business and why?Smatprt (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info. Sad to hear the story of another theatre (and of such repute) go down.  As Executive/Artistic Director of a regional rep company for 26 years now, I do indeed know how hard it is to produce equity Shakespeare and keep a balanced budget. There's the rub. Smatprt (talk) 23:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I figured we were a band of brothers :)  Yup - still at the helm, but recently (just) split my job and am now simply Executive Director, bringing on our first (other) Artistic Director this year. I'm focussing on raising $6M for a capital campaign to rebuild our aging theatre. We are Pacific Repertory Theatre, the only year-round equity theatre between San Luis Obispo and San Jose, on the central California coast. 8-9 professional productions every year (including 2-3 Shakes), 2-3 children's productions under our SoDA program (School of Dramatic Arts), about 180 performances per year.  We just opened our 370th production in our 26 year history. PacRep.org is our website. Hope to have a revamped website next month. Cheers!Smatprt (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes - totally public - not that I've ever hid my identity. But you can write me at smatprt@aol.com

I'm sure there are plenty. (As I had recalled, Ashland opened with Merchant). Good rewrite on the Riverside part of R&J. Whenever I see a "most" on Wikipedia, I usually question it, which is what first caught my eye re: your entry. I usually type in the edit summary - "Was there a survey?" Typically it's when someone writes "Most Scholars agree that..." having to do with Shakespeare himself (of which there are so many things that are just unknowable - ooops, veering toward that pesky Authorship issue again!)Smatprt (talk) 13:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Just didn't think Booth's choice of R&J warranted another section subtitle.Smatprt (talk) 03:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:TOM_JONES_2008_COLOUR.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TOM_JONES_2008_COLOUR.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 07:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RIVERSIDE REUNION GROUP PHOTO SMALL 2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE REUNION GROUP PHOTO SMALL 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Booth
As long as the LOC gets back to you in a reasonable time frame and you're able to report their results, that's fine with me. Biruitorul (talk) 03:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Don't Panic
I'm about to move the WGT article to the place you want it. Some temporary deletions may be necessary. Don't panic. - Nunh-huh 05:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, I'm all done now :) - Nunh-huh 05:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

You might also be interested in Winter Garden Theatre (disambiguation).--Pharos (talk) 06:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yep. Saw this.  Thanks.  Now get some sleep!

Weimar03 (talk) 06:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE_ROMEO_&_JULIET_POSTER_SMALL_revised.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE_ROMEO_&_JULIET_POSTER_SMALL_revised.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE_MIDSUMMER_NIGHTS_DREAM_1978_10.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE_MIDSUMMER_NIGHTS_DREAM_1978_10.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RIVERSIDE_ROMEO_&_JULIET_TYBALTS_GHOST_SMALL_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE_ROMEO_&_JULIET_TYBALTS_GHOST_SMALL_2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE_TWELFTH_NIGHT_POSTER_2_SMALL.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE_TWELFTH_NIGHT_POSTER_2_SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE-HAMLET-OPHELIA-2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE-HAMLET-OPHELIA-2.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSID_MIDSUMMER_POSTER_1_small.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSID_MIDSUMMER_POSTER_1_small.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:AS_YOU_LIKE_IT_POSTER_2_SMALL.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AS_YOU_LIKE_IT_POSTER_2_SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE_AS_YOU_LIKE_IT_final_flat.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE_AS_YOU_LIKE_IT_final_flat.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RIVERSIDE_MIDSUMMER_SET_SMALL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE_MIDSUMMER_SET_SMALL.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:MIDSUMMER-MECHANICALS-SMALL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MIDSUMMER-MECHANICALS-SMALL.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE_MUCH_ADO_1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE_MUCH_ADO_1.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE-HENRY-IV-PHOTO-35.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE-HENRY-IV-PHOTO-35.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RIVERSIDE_HENRY_IV_PHOTO_HOTSPUR_&_HAL_101_SMALL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE_HENRY_IV_PHOTO_HOTSPUR_&_HAL_101_SMALL.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RIVERSIDE_HENRY_IV_PHOTO_1_SMALL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE_HENRY_IV_PHOTO_1_SMALL.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE_THE_MANDRAKE_10_SMALL_with_TITLE_SEPIA.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE_THE_MANDRAKE_10_SMALL_with_TITLE_SEPIA.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RIVERSIDE_THE_MANDRAKE_15_1979.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE_THE_MANDRAKE_15_1979.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RIVERSIDE_THE_MANDRAKE_25_HANKS_small.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE_THE_MANDRAKE_25_HANKS_small.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RIVERSIDE_MANDRAKE_AT_SHAKESPEARE_GARDENS_53_small_REVISED.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE_MANDRAKE_AT_SHAKESPEARE_GARDENS_53_small_REVISED.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RIVERSIDE_MANDRAKE_AT_SHAKESPEARE_GARDENS_80.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE_MANDRAKE_AT_SHAKESPEARE_GARDENS_80.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE_LOVES_LABORS_LOST_poster_SMALL.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE_LOVES_LABORS_LOST_poster_SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE_SHAKESPEARE_COMPANY_SHAKESPEARE_CENTER_1982_iii_small.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RIVERSIDE_SHAKESPEARE_COMPANY_SHAKESPEARE_CENTER_1982_iii_small.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Photo permissions
You can release the images on an official web site, e.g. as on http://johnlekay.com/gfdl.photos.htm with a link from the image page to that site. You can email "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" (obviously replacing AT and DOT with the appropriate symbol) with a statement of permission. See Requesting_copyright_permission for more details.  Ty  13:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Some advice
Hi, if the images have been taken by you, or if you're the copyright holder, just send an e-mail to permissions-en (at) wikimedia.org: provide a link to the images, state that you're the copyright holder, and that you're releasing the images under a free license (such as CC-BY-SA or GFDL). Remember that you are the copyright holder for the photographs taken by yourself. But, you can't claim to be copyright holder for posters owned by a company, just because you scanned them or modified them to create new images -- you need to be the actual copyright holder for the original posters.

For any clarifications, you can seek help at Image copyright help desk or Media copyright questions. utcursch | talk 13:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Image stuff
Hi, sorry about the torrent of notices... I use a script to nominate things, so it automatically spams your page. For the images that I tagged no source (and the other self-taken photos in the article), just leave a note that you took them yourself--that should be fine. For the posters, have someone at the theater company email permissions-en@wikimedia.org specifying the URLs and releasing them under a free license (see WP:COPYREQ); we need confirmation from the copyright holder (which is presumably the theater itself and not you, if you were an employee of the theater) to make sure that the release of these images under a free license is authorized. To edit an image page, just click edit at the top like you would an article; it will let you add any more informatino to the image page that you want. Mangostar (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm, if the theater is now defunct (something that should be added to the article, by the way), this makes the copyright issues very complicated. It is possible that the poster images may be able to be used only under wp's nonfree image policy. Were you an employee of the theater when you created these images? Also, please add a note to any non-poster photos saying whether you took them or not. Mangostar (talk) 17:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem is that since you were an employee, the theater (not you) owned the copyright. This is a case of an orphan work where the current copyright holder is difficult to identify.  (Who acquired the theater's assets when it dissolved?)  I can ask at WP:MCQ but normally we handle these the same way as any non-free image, meaning only keeping those that satisfy WP:NONFREE. Mangostar (talk) 22:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * When you said you were an employee, I assumed that meant you were on the payroll. If you were just a volunteer who knows who has the copyright (probably you?) and I certainly wouldn't worry about it. Please add a note of this on the image pages and at the IFD so people know the circumstances in which these posters were created. (And on the image pages, where you say that a photo was created by W. Stuart McDowell, can you write in parentheses User:Weimar03 so people know that is you, for later reference?) There are also other images on the RSC page I didn't tag for deletion--can you go through those too and add the necessary info about where the images came from? One image I was wondering about in particular is Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE PROJECT 5.jpg, which has halftoning that suggests it might have been scanned from a newspaper. Thanks for clearing this up.  Mangostar (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, if someone is an employee the copyright in their work is owned by their employer (absent an agreement otherwise)--see work for hire. The examples you name may be people who are independent contractors (for whom this doctrine does not apply) or those who contracted specifically to keep the copyright in their work. Mangostar (talk) 00:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:LAURA KEENES THEATRE SMALL.jpg
Hi Weimar03!

We thank you for uploading Image:LAURA KEENES THEATRE SMALL.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

RSC photos
Thanks for your hard work. I may check through them later--if I have any more questions, I'll ask on your talk page. Mangostar (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I put all the photos back on the page--looks like OrphanBot was taking them off. In the future, whenever you add a source to an image page you can just remove the source needed tag at the same time (if the tagger disagrees that the source is sufficient they can replace it later). Good work on The Winter Garden Theatre (1850), by the way. That's quite an impressive article! I'm sure you found it much easier to be dealing with images from so long ago where copyright is not an issue.... Mangostar (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry again for the delay, I just wrote on the IFD page that this has all been resolved. Hopefully there will be no more issues. I see that another eagle-eyed image patroller has contacted you about the poster, and it looks like your explanation did the trick. Mangostar (talk) 01:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE SEASON POSTER 1982 SMALL 2.jpg
Can you explain how you are the copyright holder of Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE SEASON POSTER 1982 SMALL 2.jpg? Do you own the copyright to this work? Corvus cornix talk  23:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Do you still own the copyright, or does the Riverside Shakespeare Company? Corvus cornix talk  16:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Great, thanks. Just wanted to make sure all of the ts were crossed and is dotted. :)  Corvus cornix  talk  18:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:DRUMS in the NIGHT SET DESIGN.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DRUMS in the NIGHT SET DESIGN.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 15:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Also Image:OCTOBER FEST.jpg and Image:JUNGLE OF CITIES SMALL.jpg. --dave pape (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

==

Image permission problem with Image:RAGTIME QUOTE PHOTO 2 small copy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RAGTIME QUOTE PHOTO 2 small copy.jpg I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ==

Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

==

Image permission problem with Image:RIVERSID MIDSUMMER POSTER 1 small.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSID MIDSUMMER POSTER 1 small.jpg I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ==

Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE EDWARD POSTER 100 small.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE EDWARD POSTER 100 small.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE GREENSHOW MERRY WIVES RIGHT 1983.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE GREENSHOW MERRY WIVES RIGHT 1983.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE GREENSHOW MERRY WIVES 1983.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE GREENSHOW MERRY WIVES 1983.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE HENRY IV PHOTO 1 SMALL.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE HENRY IV PHOTO 1 SMALL.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE KING LEAR POSTER SMALL 2.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE KING LEAR POSTER SMALL 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE MANDRAKE AT SHAKESPEARE GARDENS 53 small REVISED.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE MANDRAKE AT SHAKESPEARE GARDENS 53 small REVISED.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE MANDRAKE AT SHAKESPEARE GARDENS 80.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE MANDRAKE AT SHAKESPEARE GARDENS 80.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE MERRY WIVES 1983 color yellow poster final.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE MERRY WIVES 1983 color yellow poster final.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE MIDSUMMER NIGHTS DREAM 1978 10.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE MIDSUMMER NIGHTS DREAM 1978 10.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET TYBALTS GHOST SMALL 2.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET TYBALTS GHOST SMALL 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET TYBALTS GHOST WASHINGTON SQ.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET TYBALTS GHOST WASHINGTON SQ.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY HAROLD SCOTT as BRUTUS 2.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY HAROLD SCOTT as BRUTUS 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY HAROLD SCOTT as BRUTUS 3.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY HAROLD SCOTT as BRUTUS 3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE INAUGURAL PRODUCTION OF Romeo & Juliet, Columbia University, August, 1977 SMALL.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE INAUGURAL PRODUCTION OF Romeo & Juliet, Columbia University, August, 1977 SMALL.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE PROJECT 5.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE PROJECT 5.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 1 1979.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 1 1979.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 10 1979.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 10 1979.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 15 1979.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 15 1979.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 20 HANKS small .jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 20 HANKS small .jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 25 HANKS small.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 25 HANKS small.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

==

Image permission problem with Image:RIVERSIDE WINTERS TALE POSTER.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE WINTERS TALE POSTER.jpg I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ==

Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE-HENRY-IV-PHOTO-35.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE-HENRY-IV-PHOTO-35.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RIVERSIDE GREENSHOW MERRY WIVES FINAL 1983.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RIVERSIDE GREENSHOW MERRY WIVES FINAL 1983.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE CAESAR 1 XXX.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE CAESAR 1 XXX.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE HENRY IV PHOTO 1 SMALL.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE HENRY IV PHOTO 1 SMALL.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET POSTER SMALL.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE ROMEO & JULIET POSTER SMALL.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ROMEO & JULIET small final copy.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ROMEO & JULIET small final copy.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE EDWARD II 10 SMALL.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE EDWARD II 10 SMALL.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 6 SMALL with TITLE SEPIA.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 6 SMALL with TITLE SEPIA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE SEASON POSTER 1982 SMALL 2.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE SEASON POSTER 1982 SMALL 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Victor Argo
I agree with you about Victor Argo. On top of this page I have posted the my official "welcome to Wikipedia" thing, something that someone else should have done a long time ago. In it you will find some useful links as to how things work around here. If you need any help here sorting things out, please let me know. Take care, Tony the Marine (talk) 16:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:LOVES_LABORS_LOST_SMALL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LOVES_LABORS_LOST_SMALL.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:RIVERSIDE LOGO 4.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE LOGO 4.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Image source and copyright licensing problem with Image:KARL VALENTIN WITH BICYCLE 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KARL VALENTIN WITH BICYCLE 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the image under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Raymond (talk) 14:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Riverside Shakespeare
Hi, just FYI, I've cleaned up this article to make it more readable, per the feedback on the article's talk page. See discussion and notes on the Talk page for more info. Cheers. Softlavender (talk) 06:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit/photo uploads
Hi, User:Weimar03 I had some questions.

I can tell you are familiar with jazz pianist/composer Michael Wolff (I had no idea until looking at your article that he narrated the orchestra arrangement for the Shakespeare theater!), and I was wondering if you would be interested in collaborating on some photos and, even some copyediting. Mr. Wolff's children are singer-songwriters/musicians Nat and Alex Wolff, the stars of The Naked Brothers Band TV series, a series his wife, ABC's Thirtysomething actress Polly Draper, created, wrote, executive produced, and directed. Mr. Wolff was co-star, co-executive producer, and music producer/supervisor.

I have worked intensely with the film article, The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie which received a WP:GAN and would need more edits before WP:FAC. I am currently nominating The Naked Brothers Band TV series article for WP:GAN. At the GAN review, they noted that the photos for the season shouldn't be there and to, instead, get one pic of the entire cast. He recommended, for one of them, a photo of Michael Wolff (the one you've submitted on his Wiki article.)

I wanted to know if you could help me out with the photos and maybe even help me copyedit the movie and series article (so maybe the movie article could receive a WP:FAC and the series article to receive a WP:GAN.) I thought that you might be able to help, as you have some interest with Michael Wolff. It's up to you, would you like to help me with the articles?

Thanx!

ATC. Talk 00:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP EBINGER OPENING FRAM.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP EBINGER OPENING FRAM.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:THE WINTERS TALE 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:THE WINTERS TALE 2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RIVERSIDE GREENSHOW MERRY WIVES FINAL 1983.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RIVERSIDE GREENSHOW MERRY WIVES FINAL 1983.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 19:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angela Goethals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Players (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Awards lists in play articles
Based on your past editing activity, you may want to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Theatre.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:BARAK OBAMAM RALLY TWO smallest.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:BARAK OBAMA AT WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY RALLY 2 25 08 SMALL VERTICLE.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:BOOTH THEATRE 6826eht.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:BOOTHS THEATRE HENRY V 1883.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:BOOTHS THEATRE R&J 1869 SMALL.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:BOOTHS THEATRE EXTERIOR 1869.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:CAESAR POSTER 10 small.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:COMEDY-OF-ERRORS-POSTER-4.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:RIVERSIDE MUCH ADO 1.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE MUCH ADO 1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:AUGUST OSAGE COUNTY SEPT 2010 SMALL.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AUGUST OSAGE COUNTY SEPT 2010 SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

CCI Notice
Hello, Weimar03. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 19:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP FABER AND VALENTIN.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP FABER AND VALENTIN.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kaldari (talk) 19:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP EBINGER & FABER LAST SHOT 2.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP EBINGER & FABER LAST SHOT 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kaldari (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:RIVERSIDE CHRISTMAS CAROL WITH MASTRANTONIO 3 small.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE CHRISTMAS CAROL WITH MASTRANTONIO 3 small.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. MER-C 12:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:VALENTIN ORCH PROB 1.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VALENTIN ORCH PROB 1.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP FABER AND VALENTIN.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP FABER AND VALENTIN.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP EBINGER & FABER LAST SHOT 2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MYSERIES OF A BARBERSHOP EBINGER & FABER LAST SHOT 2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE INAUGURAL PRODUCTION OF Romeo & Juliet, Columbia University, August, 1977 REVISED.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE INAUGURAL PRODUCTION OF Romeo & Juliet, Columbia University, August, 1977 REVISED.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AS YOU LIKE IT SMALL.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AS YOU LIKE IT SMALL.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:BARACK OBAMA WITH MARIAN EDWARDS 2 25 08 SMALL.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BARACK OBAMA WITH MARIAN EDWARDS 2 25 08 SMALL.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:BOOTHS THEATRE EXTERIOR 1869.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BOOTHS THEATRE EXTERIOR 1869.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File:BOOTHS THEATRE EXTERIOR 1869.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BOOTHS THEATRE EXTERIOR 1869.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File:BOOTHS THEATRE HENRY V 1883.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BOOTHS THEATRE HENRY V 1883.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:CAESAR POSTER 10 small.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CAESAR POSTER 10 small.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 10 SMALL with TITLE SEPIA.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 10 SMALL with TITLE SEPIA.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:EDWARD II SCENE 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:EDWARD II SCENE 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:COHEN THE THEATRE.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:COHEN THE THEATRE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

File:SAMUEL-H.-SCRIPPS-3.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SAMUEL-H.-SCRIPPS-3.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RIVERSIDE CAESAR PHOTO 101.jpg


The file File:RIVERSIDE CAESAR PHOTO 101.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-useful media."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  09:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:THE WINTER GARDEN THEATRE.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:THE WINTER GARDEN THEATRE.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  09:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:PROGRAM OPENING NIGHT BOOTH&#39;S THEATRE.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PROGRAM OPENING NIGHT BOOTH&, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  09:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:BOOTHS THEATRE R&#38;J 1869 SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BOOTHS THEATRE R&, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:LAURA KEENES THEATRE SMALL.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LAURA KEENES THEATRE SMALL.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:WINTERS TALE FOLIO 1.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WINTERS TALE FOLIO 1.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:FATZER 4 small.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FATZER 4 small.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE EDWARD II SCENE 1 SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE EDWARD II SCENE 1 SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE MERRY WIVES 1983 color yellow poster.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE MERRY WIVES 1983 color yellow poster.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE-HENRY-V-2.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE-HENRY-V-2.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE MERRY WIVES 1983.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE MERRY WIVES 1983.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE LEAR FINALE 10.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE LEAR FINALE 10.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:COMEDY-OF-ERRORS-POSTER-4.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:COMEDY-OF-ERRORS-POSTER-4.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE TWELFTH NIGHT POSTER 2 SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE TWELFTH NIGHT POSTER 2 SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE CAESAR POSTER 10 SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE CAESAR POSTER 10 SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE LEAR FINALE 4.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE LEAR FINALE 4.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE-HENRY-IV-PHOTO-35.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE-HENRY-IV-PHOTO-35.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE SEASON POSTER 1982 SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE SEASON POSTER 1982 SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE CAESAR PHOTO 111.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE CAESAR PHOTO 111.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE MIDSUMMER NIGHTS DREAM 1978 6.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE MIDSUMMER NIGHTS DREAM 1978 6.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  10:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:GLOBE LONDON 1.jpg


The file File:GLOBE LONDON 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:SAMUEL-H.-SCRIPPS.jpg


The file File:SAMUEL-H.-SCRIPPS.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RIVERSIDE LOVES LABORS LOST SMALL.jpg


The file File:RIVERSIDE LOVES LABORS LOST SMALL.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE EDWARD II 1 SMALL.jpg


The file File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE EDWARD II 1 SMALL.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RIVERSID MIDSUMMER PUCK 1.jpg


The file File:RIVERSID MIDSUMMER PUCK 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE HAMLET POSTER 2 SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE HAMLET POSTER 2 SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MICHAEL WOLFF @ THE KNICKERBOCKER BAR & GRILL 20 MARCH 2010 BY WSMCDOWELL.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MICHAEL WOLFF @ THE KNICKERBOCKER BAR & GRILL 20 MARCH 2010 BY WSMCDOWELL.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE AS YOU LIKE IT final flat.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE AS YOU LIKE IT final flat.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE LOVES LABORS LOST poster SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE LOVES LABORS LOST poster SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY HAROLD SCOTT as BRUTUS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RIVERSIDE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY HAROLD SCOTT as BRUTUS.jpg, which you've attributed to W. Stuart McDowell. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SAMUEL-H.-SCRIPPS-6.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SAMUEL-H.-SCRIPPS-6.jpg, which you've attributed to W. Stuart McDowell. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 6 SMALL with TITLE.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 6 SMALL with TITLE.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 6 SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE 6 SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

File:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE1 SMALL.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RIVERSIDE THE MANDRAKE1 SMALL.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --<span style="font-family: monospace, monospace; color:#69C;">Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)