User talk:Welhaven

Vandalism from IP editors
I notice that your talk page has been receiving a deal of vandalism from IP editors (I suspect they are all one editor, using proxies). Note that if it persists, you might consider requesting temporary semi-protection of your talk page at WP:RFPP.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  15:23, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Redistribution of Wealth article
I noticed you reverted changes I made to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redistribution_of_wealth and labeled them as vandalism. The few sentences I removed are statistics about public opinion on the topic and belong in a section about public opinion, not the opening section. Feel free to create a section for them, but do not put them in the opening section as they do not belong there. 69.117.163.51 (talk) 09:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Arundhati Roy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Silivrenion (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Funandtrvl (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)


 * In your edit to the imperialism article, you added some old content Question: What sources make those claims which you added to the article in this edit: ? That was removed prior for lack of sources, and has since been removed. Please see WP:OR and WP:V on the necessity for having sources for claims, particularly for current writers/people.Ebanony (talk) 04:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * This is my second warning to you. You restored WP:OR to the American imperialism article; such is a violation of policy and has been removed. Please do not do it again.Ebanony (talk) 00:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked as sock of Mbhiii
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your . Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)