User talk:Well-rested/Archives/2014/February

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter
The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer, whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:


 * and were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
 * scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
 * scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Featured topics/She Wolf.
 * scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
 * has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Accounting Review
The article The Accounting Review you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Accounting Review for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- 21:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 *  NOTE: Please comment, below entire GA Review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Accounting, Organizations and Society
Orlady (talk) 08:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of AACSB-accredited schools (accounting), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tuscaloosa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you -- Well-rested Talk  09:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Earnings surprise
Hello! Your submission of Earnings surprise at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cinosaur (talk) 15:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Talk:The Accounting Review/GA1
I left a reply at Talk:The Accounting Review/GA1. Not much left to do there, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Accounting Review
The article The Accounting Review you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Accounting Review for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- 03:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * PS: Actually, "rare" does not say it: this was the first article on an academic journal making GA and only the second article in the WikiProject Academic Journals... Bravo! --Randykitty (talk) 19:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Haha yeah I noticed that when I tried looking for prior academic journal GAs to get some reference point when improving the article; was really surprised to see that there weren't any! -- Well-rested Talk  19:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I've followed your lead and used the comments you got on TAR and have now nominated Genes, Brain and Behavior. :-) --Randykitty (talk) 20:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Earnings surprise
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Convergence of accounting standards/GA1
--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)