User talk:Wellbelove

The page on Steve Reed was edited to say that Steve Reed only narrowly became leader of Lambeth council. This is incorrect given that it was a landslide victory which saw the Liberal Democrats lose previously safe seats - with many of their cabinet losing their seats.

Steve Reed (Lambeth Councillor)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Steve Reed (Lambeth Councillor), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Councillor Steve Reed


The article Councillor Steve Reed has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  ttonyb (talk) 21:36, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Election sillyness
Steve Reed is currently standing for election in Croydon North, London, UK

His opponents are trying to insinuate that he caused Lambeth to be a failing council by reporting results of a report at the start of his leadership. He clearly could not be to blame for prior administration (which was not the same political party) and the subtle change of wording I have made helps make this clear.


 * The results reported were not at the start of his leadership. The report was about a year later. Wikipedia policy is to report what reliable sources say, not our own interpretations. If you can find a reliable source making that argument, then please include it. However, at the moment, the citation there, the Evening Standard article, does not support the interpretation you are putting on the article. Bondegezou (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Steve Reed edit-war
At this point, I have taken no action in response to the edit-war between you and User:Bondegezou. However, please read my note at WP:ANEW. You need to address the content dispute in discussion, not in a battle in the article. Otherwise, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)