User talk:Welvas

Removed all criticism of Young America Corp
Please justify this : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_America_Corporation&diff=next&oldid=173705821 —Preceding unsigned comment added by IReceivedDeathThreats (talk • contribs) 17:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. tedder (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please don't remove cited criticism sections Falcon8765 (talk) 19:20, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Again, please do not remove cited material with no explanation. Falcon8765 (talk) 19:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. tedder (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Young America
You are close to being blocked for removing material from Young America Corporation and adding uncited information. If you have a conflict of interest with Young America, please see WP:COI.

Finally, and most importantly, please detail your reasons on Talk:Young America Corporation. tedder (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

''Uninvolved. Via NPOV noticeboard''' As above, please engage on Talk:Young America Corporation. Your repeated edits seem to be in violation of WP:NPOV Please discuss on the talk page before again removing article content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaymax (talk • contribs) 08:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. tedder (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Response from user
Hello, my name is Scott Welvaert, the Marketing and Creative Services Manager for Young America Corporation (PH# (redact), email: (redact)). An admitted wiki-idiot, my intentions with the edits on this article were two-fold - update inaccurate information and remove the Criticism section of the article as much of it is outdated, plus the media treats the rebate business like the tabloid industry treats celebrities, without much accuracy. If you have questions or concerns, feel free to contact me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Welvas (talk • contribs)


 * Hi Scott, thanks for letting us know about your conflict of interest. It's okay to edit on Wikipedia, and even on the Young America Corporation, but it's very important to follow Wikipedia's policy on editing with a conflict of interest. Please also read the business FAQ, especially the question at WP:BFAQ. One of Wikipedia's 5 pillars is that Wikipedia has a neutral point of view. That means information should be verifiable (i.e., from reliable third-party sources), and that Wikipedia articles will have positive and negative information about a company.


 * Let me know if you have specific questions. tedder (talk) 16:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)