User talk:Wenbo wan/sandbox

Peer Review by Tristancater08 and Nnaimthe1
Since the vast majority of this article revolves around statistics, there is not much to say in the way of neutrality or points of view being either over represented or underrepresented. While the sources used in the article were (for the most part) relevant to the article, there were some inconsistencies. For example, for source one (in table one), there is no statistics for the European Union that we could find. There was a value there for Europe, but it's not the same thing as the number in the article presently. Also, the numbers for Australia and Malaysia are incorrect. In source two, the statistics for the imports in the second table are from 2011, and not from 2015. Also, speaking of the second table (the table about the largest Chinese trade partners), there are no sources for the remaining data on the table (Exports and Total Trade). We found out this information after from source #1, but we found that the data exports was misplaced in the total trade section, so this needs to be fixed. Finally, the trade balance for the United States is incorrect, and it should be 261.4. Source #3 is fine, no problems there. For source #4, all of the values are correct except for Iraq, which should be 25.4 % instead of 21.9%. For source #5, all of the values are correct except for Iraq, which should be 23.5 % instead of 26.9%, Bangladesh, which should be 26.3 % instead of 24.3 %, and the Philippines, which should be 18.6 % instead of 17.3 %. Finally, for source #6, the data is okay, but it would be a good idea to include the import regions as well.

Overall, the article is definitely off to a good start, and as long as the data is corrected, this article would definitely be worthy of publishing onto Wikipedia.

Peer review's response
Wenbo wan (talk). Firstly, thank you guys very much for pointing out a couple of incorrect data and mistakes we made. Frankly speaking, the biggest difficulty we have is the source, because we found different official website have the different data, that is quite confusing, maybe that is why you find the data is a little bit different from the source you find. But anyway, we still appreciate you can take your time to correct our list data. For example, the total trade figures of Europe from source 1 are different compared with other source. So we will correct the data from official website later. The data of Malaysia and Australia have been corrected depend on source 2.

In terms of the wrong year number that we used in second chart, we have corrected it to 2011. As for the source linking problems, we will not only add source 4 to the remaining data on the table 2, but put the corresponding link on where it is necessary too. That way, the data will be specific and easy to understand.

The problem of putting data in wrong place is fixed. Thanks to your patient and careful reviewing, we have chance to update the right data of Iraq, Philippines and Bangladesh. For the last problem you mentioned, we have source seven which includes the imports data.

In our next step, we will check our data again and put more information in the article. We will try our best to organize them. Thank you again; we appreciate it that we improve this project together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wenbo wan (talk • contribs) 14:25, 12 March 2018 (UTC)