User talk:Wendywelsh87

June 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to FanDuel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: FanDuel was changed by Wendywelsh87 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903229 on 2016-06-09T21:12:31+00:00.

Welcome!
Hello, Wendywelsh87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Lizzius (talk) 16:39, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melvin Wong


A tag has been placed on Melvin Wong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Re:Your Email
It wouldn't matter if was deleted for the right reasons or the wrong reasons, when an article that was deleted via an afd deletion (such as yours) is rebuilt there are special conditions set forth that determine whether the article gets to stay or ends up re-deleted.

When an article is deleted as a result of an afd deletion then the stigma of going before a community based deletion discussion for the subject with regard to the article in question manifests itself profoundly in the addendum that the article - when and if it should reappear - needs to be completely rebuilt from the ground up so that it uses as little information from the deleted version as possible, This means no similar lines, no similar sources (if it can be helped), greatly expanded information related to the subject, new images, new external links, new see also sections, etc. Any article that fails to expand significantly to cover the subject in this way ends up experiencing one of three unsavory alternatives: 1) redirection to an article that better covers whatever little corner of the subject the original and so to be defunct article was attempting to cover (such as redirecting the song electric feel to the article for the band MGMT), 2) summary deletion of the article on G4 grounds which stipulate that the new article and the previously deleted article are close enough in size, scope, phrases, etc, to justify re-deleting without the need for a whole new afd process (such as what happened with your article), and 3) a new afd on grounds the material is still not eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia but is just different enough from the afd deleted version that the community needs to weigh in on the matter once again to gain consensus for the deletion. In these case the community does occasionally agree to allow an article deleted and then rebuilt to remain, but unto my experience that is very much so the exception and not the rule.

As for the article itself, you have some options. First option is rebuilding the article, which I would recommend you do either in the draft space or in a user sandbox so as to avoid having it deleted until it reaches a point where it can stand on its own to legs on the sight. Second option is to petition for a copy of the draft that was deleted, which I can restore and move either to the draft space or to your userspace for you to work on. Third option, if you prefer to argue your case in a forum, is to petition to have the deletion overturn at deletion review. I'll leave the decision of which option to pursue to you, when you have decided let me know and I can help you with the paperwork. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)