User talk:Wentoung

Your recent edits
I do not see why we should not co-operate. At the moment it seems to me that having imperfect understanding of what I have written you make your amendments just so you have made an edit. Am I wrong? Eddaido (talk) 03:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The problem is that you seem to have a bit of ownership issue. Fine, that you don't agree with all of my edits, but when you just delete throwing out the baby with the bathwater like you did at Coachwork International, then you make it a bit hard. Reality is that some of the text you have added has either been incorrect or uncited. I have attempted to address, but you just revert. May I suggest spending a bit of time to assess changes rather than just hitting the revert button. Wentoung (talk) 03:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * May I politely suggest you acquire some knowledge of the subjects before you make your unfortunate edits. How about discussing these things on the talk page of the articles and learning more. Not making the kind of commentary up above.


 * Leave my little attempts at adding info to WP alone and go tackle some bigger stuff. With luck you will acquire a better understanding of Wikipedia and some other useful knowledge. By the way, co-operation means just that. I think you have read "bold edit-revert", taken it to heart and over-estimated your knowledge of the subjects. I'll leave your edits in place for a short time on the understanding that you will try your wings elsewhere. Is that OK? I'll be watching. We are asked to be kind to newcomers. Eddaido (talk) 09:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I'll leave your edits in place for a short time on the understanding that you will try your wings elsewhere.Is that OK? I'll be watching.


 * In other words, keep off my turf and I'll keep off yours? Spare me the tough guy talk. Notice you have already been blocked twice for personal attacks, let's not make it three.


 * As you want to throw the rule book, around happy to return serve. In the Hawke Coachwork article you started that it became a subsidiary of New Zealand Motor Corporation. Yet when I include in the infobox, you declare a mistake and delete. So was it or wasn't it? Lkewise you are of the opinion that the factory was taken over by Designline, yet it is uncited. So much as you might not like it, I am adding cited text to articles in line with verification policy and querying some that is not cited.


 * Then there is the double standards re abbreviations. You object which is fine, but you did the very same thing here. Do as I say and not as I do? Wentoung (talk) 06:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC)