User talk:Weppner.c

Welcome!
Hello, Weppner.c, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review
What does the article (or section) do well? Very good explanation of what risk arbitrage is. Lead is strong. Overall, you do a good job with the first paragraph. Very strong and nicely organized. You also do a good job at your style of writing. Really suits Wikipedia. Words and phrases are all neutral. Sources all seem reliable.

What changes would you suggest overall? Honestly, not familiar with the topic so don't really have any changes to give you. I know you're not done but more information can be used.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Good so far.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? The style of writing is definitely something that I can learn. Also the structure is something I can learn from.

Personally it's a topic that I really don't understand so I have no idea where your article could go to next, but overall clear and organized structure. Seems like you're on top of everything. Dimademashkieh (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Risk arbitrage
Nice work on the risk arbitrage article. However, I noticed that you used unformatted URLs as references. These are uninformative to readers, and difficult to maintain in the long run. If you use the Cite tool (up on the toolbar in the VisualEditor), you can usually generate a reference using a weblink/URL, a DOI, or PubMed ID. I recommend doing that - it's usually easier for you, and easier for your readers to find your source. (If you reply to this message here, please include  in your response, to ensure that I see your reply.) Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the feedback! I'll make the updates.  Weppner.c (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Nice work on this unit--the additions you made improved the quality of the page overall. Nicely done! Amyc29 (talk) 17:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)