User talk:Weppner.c/sandbox

Peer Review
What does the article (or section) do well? Very detailed article and a great substitute for the current "Risk Arbitrage" that is currently on Wikipedia. I think you outline very well the main concept and then go on to describe the different aspects of it. You also give a simplified description which I think is great.

What changes would you suggest overall? I honestly don't have any changes to suggest since I think this is very complete and I lack the knowledge on the subject to suggest any additions or changes.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Nothing really, the style of writing suits Wikipedia very well and the topic presented is very well described.

'''Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know!''' Yes, the whole organization and outline of the article is great and I could benefit from doing something similar.

Gabrields (talk) 01:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)