User talk:Wercloud

Edits on Republicans
Hi. While Wikipedia welcomes input from everyone, your recent edits on various Republican politicians are clearly not written with a neutral point of view and may even be interpreted as vandalism. Adding category tags like 'fascism' is to these politicians is not helpful and guaranteed to get your additions reverted. Please read the Wikipedia policies on neutrality. --Escape Orbit 20:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * My edits were made to uphold the neutral point of view policy, and claims of violation are frankly bizarre. --Wercloud

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bongwarrior 21:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I corrected blatant inclusions of opinion, and now you've restored them when you could simply have discussed it. --Wercloud

August 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on John Ashcroft. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Bongwarrior 21:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Who exactly is engaging in an edit war here? I corrected blatant POV in a few articles, and you just keep restoring them.  All you had to do was talk about it in the discussion page or change specificaly what you found objectionable, but you just kept discarding my edits without a word.  This behavior is unproductive.  --Wercloud

Edits to Donald Rumsfeld and Ronald Reagan
When editing articles, please keep in mind our policy on maintaining a neutral point of view. Your recent edits to the above articles appear to be in contrast to this policy and have been reverted. Thanks, - auburn pilot   talk  22:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * They are not in contrast to the policy, they are a direct reflection of it, so I would appreciate it if people could stop reverting my corrections before at least discussing them. --Wercloud


 * Every single edit you have made under this account has been reverted by multiple editrss as violations of our policy on maintaining a neutral point of view. Most of these edits have also earned you a warning on this page, for which you respond in a way that makes it quite clear you don't understand our policy. Now, you've attempted to leave me a warning for edit warring. Please read through our relevant policies, try discussing your edits on the relevant talk pages, and stop violating WP:NPOV. If you continue in this manner, you will be blocked from editing. - auburn pilot   talk  22:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Generally speaking, I don't pull this out very often (because invoking AGF means that I'm not really assuming good faith myself''), but please don't randomly accuse multiple editors of sockpuppetry. It's most likely not true as these editors probably found your edits by scanning Special:Recentchanges the way I did.'' --Darkwind (talk) 22:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info. Wercloud 23:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:JohnAshcroft1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:JohnAshcroft1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 05:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)