User talk:Werehog7

Welcome!

Hello, Werehog7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Advertising
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Canterbury Tail  talk  12:05, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Renard Queenston
I looked at the Google hits. There are lots of them, but which ones are reliable and demonstrate notability? --Dweller (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I guess his official website is reliable, and Renard Queenston could demonstrate notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Werehog7 (talk • contribs)
 * I'm afraid not - they both contravene BLPSPS. --Dweller (talk) 10:41, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikifur isn't self-published, and his website can be an external link. Werehog7 (talk) 10:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikifur isn't reliable. We need multiple, non trivial references to a person in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. We currently have none for him. If he's notable, he must surely have been mentioned in a non-trivial manner in a RS, like a newspaper, book or journal. --Dweller (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chocolate gravy


The article Chocolate gravy has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Some info already covered at Gravy. Hasn't received enough coverage to justify a separate article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 04:17, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Please stop. If you continue to create malicious redirects, as you did with Vlad the Impaler, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because myour account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * If possible, I'd like the blocking admin, User:Reaper Eternal to review this unblock request. Thanks. Werehog7 (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Have you edited Wikipedia either anonymously or with a userid since your block was enacted? By editing I mean "fixed a comma", "added a quotation mark", or anything that required you to click "save page" (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 00:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: You'll also want to address the deleted massive WP:BLP violation that truly disparaged a subject without any references whatsoever - that alone could lead to a decline of this unblock request (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 00:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I made a single anonymous edit on VY Canis Majoris, which was reverting vandalism that I noticed while writing an essay on it. If that BLP violation you're referring to is Renard Queenston, I now understand that just because I like an unknown musician it doesn't mean I need to write a Wikipedia article on them. Werehog7 (talk) 00:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm..I didn't even look at that one, I was thinking of Kci Baker. You need to carefully explain that one (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 12:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I can't really justify that one. Pure vandalism. Kci is a schoolfriend of mine and we sat down together and thought it would be funny if there was an article about him being a serial killer. I now understand how bad adding false information to Wikipedia is. Especially after failing a test after taking information that had been altered in bad faith. Werehog7 (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Help
Can somebody leave a note on Reaper Eternal's talk page saying that I am requesting him to look over my unblock appeal. Werehog7 (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Reaper has no need to review it ... any of us passing unblock review admins can. If we need to chat with Reaper, we'll do so. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 00:27, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've seen this request, and there are some things that concern me. Please wait a bit. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Unsurprisingly, this account was ✅ as Wagner. Bwilkins, I guess he was wondering if I would notice. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)