User talk:Wesmanbigmig/Archive 1

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed content from However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that is relevant to the article. You have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Eeekster (talk) 07:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC) Unlucky for the Anglican Church Grammar School. Didn't know they were so sensitive :P - JRA WestyQld2 (talk) 08:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - JRA WestyQld2 (talk) 01:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi JRA. We are attempting to make a few simple adjustments to the Wikipedia page for Anglican Church Grammar School. All we want to do at this stage is remove the non-existent image link in the History section, and the School wishes to have the Controversy section moved further down the page. Many other websites feature a Controversy section, but this is located far down the page. You have no reason to continue undoing our edits without discussing with us first. If you continue to do this without first contacting us, we will request your editing permissions get blocked.

Update: We have now made those adjustments - moving the Controversy section down the page and removing the broken image link in the History section. Please DO NOT revert these changes. Review what we have done and you will see that everything is still in place. Regards, Wesmanbigmig (talk) 02:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. I am contacting you when I revert your edits. Please remember, Wikipedia is not censored and unfortunately this school has quite a poor track record. Please do not continue to re-arrange or blank sections. - JRA WestyQld2 (talk) 02:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

JRA - please advise what the problem is with rearranging the page?? Who says that you get to determine the order the page gets listed in? I need you to explain what problem you have here, or what authority you think you have with being able to stipulate the ordering of sections on this page. Get back to me on this.
 * Hi Wesmanbigmig, please make sure you sign your posts when leaving comments on peoples talk pages as well as leaving an edit summary. Ordering of sections is an important part of Wikipedia! If you have any questions about the topic, I suggest you read Guide to writing better articles and perhaps Wikipedia's guide to page layouts, which you can also find on that page. Until you read over this, I suggest you stop editing Anglican Church Grammar School, as your edits are non-constructive and an annoyance to undo. I have and will assume good faith, but continuing to edit Wikipedia in such a way that is non-constructive or helpful, you run the risk of being banned. I suggest you read before continue editing:

Finally please remember it's not about winning!. It's not a competition as Ego does not matter to Wikipedia; egos and pride are not helpful to building encyclopedia articles, and ego and pride need to yield to consensus if a conflict between them somehow occur. I hope this information helps you. Consider this a friendly final warning. Happy editing! - JRA WestyQld2 (talk) 03:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * NPOV
 * NOT - Images and Censorship particularly
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
 * Guidelines for controversial articles
 * Oh and please remember, Wikipedia has a strong policy on legal threats without reasoning. If you make such threats again, I will have no option other than to report you. Please refrain from doing this again. Thank you - JRA WestyQld2 (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

We are not making any "legal threats" so don't suggest this. We are simply requesting your good reasoning in behind some of the minor edits we are attempting to make and that you keep blocking. Please stop wasting our time without first reviewing the changes we are making and communicating with us regarding the sequencing of content on the Churchie page.Wesmanbigmig (talk) 03:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC) JRA - Please stop reverting the changes. They are reasonable and you are not solely in charge of this page. Unless you can provide us with a good reason behind why you keep reverting our changes and explain your rationale in doing so, we will request your account be blocked.Wesmanbigmig (talk) 03:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Please remember your edits are non-constructive. Unless you can provide a reason why the controversy section should be at the bottom of the page, then please refrain from an edit war. As an outsider, I believe what makes the Anglican Church Grammar School most notable is the controversy. Referring to the other article you stated is not good enough, please remember WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS does not warrant a reason. Threatening to have myself blocked from editing Wikipedia is harassment and not the right way to deal with this situation. Please assume good faith, if you have a request for mediation, I am more than happy to participate and can submit a RFM if you would like that? In the mean time, refrain from creating an edit war. Thank you - JRA WestyQld2 (talk) 03:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm going to have to side with JRA on this. The controversy is the most notable part of the article, and should be situated higher up the page. Relocating it just because the school is concerned does not apply and cannot be done; I apologize in advance if they take offense to it, but we do not censor our articles based on how organizations or individuals wish to be portrayed.


 * In the meantime, please do not wave blocking in other peoples' faces when dealing with them; leave that to us.


 * Any questions or concerns are welcome here or on my talk page. Cheers, Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :D  05:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)