User talk:Wessexboy

Community restrictions
O Fenian (talk) 16:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. O Fenian (talk) 15:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It is proposed at WP:AE that you be blocked five days for violating the Troubles 1RR restriction on the article about the royal visit and for making tendentious statements. You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee." Per the result of a discussion at AE, under the authority of WP:ARBCOM/TROUBLES. Admins concluded that you violated the Troubles 1RR restriction at Queen Elizabeth II's visit to the Republic of Ireland, and made tendentious statements. EdJohnston (talk) 20:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)