User talk:WestMktTD

Welcome
Hello WestMktTD. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WestMktTD. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- VViking Talk Edits 13:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Hello VVikinig, I work for this organization and my resources are the CEO Tim Duitsman and our CFO asking me to make these changes. I'm new to Wikipedia and have a lot to learn, but am being asked to make these edits quickly. Regards, WesteMktTDWestMktTD (talk) 14:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Kinu t/c 18:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The text of this edit is most certainly promotional in tone. Regardless, role accounts are not allowed. -- Kinu t/c 18:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You may not use a username that represents a company or organization. Review Wikipedia's username policy and propose a new username that represents you as an individual. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

No worries as I will no longer engage in any Wikipedia nonsense in the future. I have turned this over to my CEO letting him know that this is out of the realm of my expertise etc. You may see value in this medium and that is your right, I however see no value in this tool whatsoever. You may reply but this will be the last note from me on this subject. Regards, WestMktTD (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)